Simonet D
Sante Publique. 2000 Sep;12(3):419-31.
This article summarises the evolution of management in American hospitals under managed care. More specifically, the article is centred on the measures decided upon by hospitals over the past years aiming to improve profitability which was neglected by managed care organisations. These measures involve both internal and external reforms and have largely weakened many hospitals, but have also allowed for the implementation of a number of systems that benefit the policyholder (therapeutic recommendations, a comparative study of care offered by health institutions, etc.). Furthermore, not all hospitals handle these difficulties with the same success, depending on their geographical location or their status. Some are reinforced by these strategies, while others are forced to close. These measures have often resulted in mergers between hospitals, reorganisation of services, or laying off personnel. While some of these strategies are above all strategies for withdrawal, which translate into savings that are detrimental to patients, it is equally possible to observe strategies for recovering demand (specialising care, partnerships in research and prevention, etc.). The latter, however, is less frequent than the former, which shows the serious crisis American hospitals are experiencing today.
本文总结了美国医院在管理式医疗下的管理演变。更具体地说,本文聚焦于医院在过去几年为提高盈利能力而采取的措施,而这一盈利能力曾被管理式医疗组织所忽视。这些措施涉及内部和外部改革,在很大程度上削弱了许多医院,但也促成了一些有利于投保人的系统的实施(治疗建议、医疗机构提供的护理的比较研究等)。此外,并非所有医院应对这些困难的成效都相同,这取决于它们的地理位置或地位。一些医院因这些策略而得到加强,而另一些则被迫关闭。这些措施常常导致医院合并、服务重组或人员裁员。虽然其中一些策略首先是撤离策略,会转化为对患者不利的节省开支,但也可以看到恢复需求的策略(专科护理、研究与预防方面的合作等)。然而,后者比前者少见,这表明美国医院如今正经历严重危机。