Suppr超能文献

健康维护组织(HMO)的医疗事故:闸门是否已经打开?

HMO malpractice: have the floodgates opened?

作者信息

Hansen E

机构信息

Managed Liability Associates, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Manag Care Interface. 2000 Sep;13(9):84-6.

Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court's holding in Pegram v. Herdrich--that decisions by an HMO's physician employees in which eligibility issues and reasonable medical treatment are inextricably mixed are not fiduciary acts under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)--was applauded by the managed care industry. By delineating issues on which it was not ruling, however, the Court's decision may have given a boost to additional lawsuits against managed care plans on both ERISA and malpractice grounds.

摘要

美国最高法院在“佩格拉姆诉赫德里奇案”中的裁决——健康维护组织(HMO)的医师雇员所做的将资格问题与合理医疗紧密结合的决定,不属于《雇员退休收入保障法》(ERISA)规定的受托行为——受到了管理式医疗行业的欢迎。然而,通过划定其未作裁决的问题范围,最高法院的这一裁决可能推动了更多基于《雇员退休收入保障法》和医疗事故责任对管理式医疗计划提起的诉讼。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验