Hansen E
Managed Liability Associates, Washington, DC, USA.
Manag Care Interface. 2000 Sep;13(9):84-6.
The U.S. Supreme Court's holding in Pegram v. Herdrich--that decisions by an HMO's physician employees in which eligibility issues and reasonable medical treatment are inextricably mixed are not fiduciary acts under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)--was applauded by the managed care industry. By delineating issues on which it was not ruling, however, the Court's decision may have given a boost to additional lawsuits against managed care plans on both ERISA and malpractice grounds.
美国最高法院在“佩格拉姆诉赫德里奇案”中的裁决——健康维护组织(HMO)的医师雇员所做的将资格问题与合理医疗紧密结合的决定,不属于《雇员退休收入保障法》(ERISA)规定的受托行为——受到了管理式医疗行业的欢迎。然而,通过划定其未作裁决的问题范围,最高法院的这一裁决可能推动了更多基于《雇员退休收入保障法》和医疗事故责任对管理式医疗计划提起的诉讼。