[Ⅱ类错误及其与结果解释的相关性。《放射治疗与肿瘤学》杂志的质量审核]
[Type two error and its relevance for interpretation of results. Quality audit of the Journal "Strahlentherapie und Onkologie].
作者信息
Raabe A, Dubben H H, Beck-Bornholdt H P
机构信息
Abteilung für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Universität Hamburg.
出版信息
Strahlenther Onkol. 2000 Nov;176(11):491-7. doi: 10.1007/pl00002315.
BACKGROUND
The statistical quality of the contributions to "Strahlentherapie und Onkologie" is assessed, aiming for improvement of the journal and consequently its impact factor.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
All 181 articles published during 1998 and 1999 in the categories "review", "original contribution", and "short communication" were analyzed concerning the appropriate consideration of Type II error.
RESULT
Ninety-nine publications were excluded from analysis for different specified reasons. In none of the remaining 82 clinical publications Type II error was considered.
CONCLUSION
Authors, peer reviewers, and editors could contribute to improve the quality of the journal by setting value on adequate consideration of Type II error.
背景
评估《放射治疗与肿瘤学》投稿的统计学质量，旨在改进该期刊并进而提高其影响因子。
材料与方法
分析了1998年和1999年发表在“综述”“原创性论文”和“简短通讯”类别中的所有181篇文章，看是否适当考虑了Ⅱ类错误。
结果
99篇出版物因不同的特定原因被排除在分析之外。在其余82篇临床出版物中，无一考虑了Ⅱ类错误。
结论
作者、同行评审人员和编辑可以通过重视对Ⅱ类错误的充分考虑来为提高期刊质量做出贡献。
Zotero 插件