Souter K T
School of English, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Melbourne, Australia 3083.
Am J Psychoanal. 2000 Dec;60(4):341-59. doi: 10.1023/a:1002042814341.
This article considers some of the affinities between postmodern literary theory and the psychoanalytic theories concerned with intersubjective phenomena. Postmodern literary theory is described briefly, and it is argued that one of its major concerns is the nature of, and the political and cultural influences on, subjectivity and identity. Despite that, postmodernism generally, and literary postmodernism in particular, can be said to lack a theory of the psychological and interpersonal dimensions of the experience of self. This article contends that the more relational schools of psychoanalytic theory can provide an example of the construction of selfhood that is of importance to contemporary and postmodern literary criticism. The academy has, to a considerable extent identified 'psychoanalysis' with the work of Jacques Lacan, but since the 1980s the work of such theorists as Jane Flax and Jessica Benjamin, building on the work of Nancy Chodorow, have increasingly opened up the possibilities of relational and object relations theory for literary studies. The relational psychoanalytic theories operate in the same epistemological universe as postmodern literary criticism, congruent with the postmodern idea of 'truth' as constructed and relational, and selfhood as shifting, contingent, and always-in-process. Particular attention is paid to the work of Wilfred Bion, whose understanding of self provides an account both of the failure of meaning, and of the development of mind. Some examples of a relational approach to literary analysis are provided.
本文探讨了后现代文学理论与关注主体间现象的精神分析理论之间的一些相似之处。文章简要描述了后现代文学理论,并指出其主要关注点之一是主体性和身份的本质以及政治和文化影响。尽管如此,一般来说后现代主义,尤其是文学后现代主义,可以说是缺乏一种关于自我体验的心理和人际维度的理论。本文认为,精神分析理论中更具关系性的流派可以为自我建构提供一个范例,这对当代和后现代文学批评具有重要意义。学术界在很大程度上把“精神分析”与雅克·拉康的作品划等号,但自20世纪80年代以来,简·弗拉克斯和杰西卡·本杰明等理论家在南希·乔多罗作品的基础上,越来越多地为文学研究开拓了关系理论和客体关系理论的可能性。关系精神分析理论与后现代文学批评在相同的认识论领域运作,这与后现代将“真理”视为建构性和关系性、将自我视为变化的、偶然的且始终处于过程中的观念相一致。文章特别关注了威尔弗雷德·比昂的作品,他对自我的理解既解释了意义的失败,也解释了心智的发展。文中还提供了一些文学分析的关系性方法的例子。