Suppr超能文献

头孢地尼与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗儿童化脓性急性中耳炎的安全性和疗效比较

Comparative safety and efficacy of cefdinir vs amoxicillin/clavulanate for treatment of suppurative acute otitis media in children.

作者信息

Block S L, McCarty J M, Hedrick J A, Nemeth M A, Keyserling C H, Tack K J

机构信息

Kentucky Pediatric Research, Bardstown, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000 Dec;19(12 Suppl):S159-65. doi: 10.1097/00006454-200012001-00005.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Two dosage regimens of cefdinir were compared with amoxicillin/clavulanate for the treatment of suppurative acute otitis media (AOM) in children.

METHODS

This was an investigator-blinded, randomized, comparative, multicenter trial, in which tympanocentesis was performed in 384 patients, ages 6 months to 12 years, who had nonrefractory AOM. Patients were randomized to receive one of three 10-day treatment regimens: cefdinir 14 mg/kg daily (QD; n = 128); cefdinir 7 mg/kg twice a day (BID; n = 128); or amoxicillin/clavulanate 40/10 mg/kg/day divided for use three times a day (TID; n = 128).

RESULTS

Of the 384 enrolled patients 303 were evaluable for clinical efficacy. Clinical success rates were statistically equivalent for the 3 treatment groups at the end of therapy: 85 of 102 (83.3%) for cefdinir QD; 81 of 101 (80.2%) for cefdinir BID; 86 of 100 (86%) for amoxicillin/clavulanate. Of the 197 evaluable patients from whom a susceptible pathogen was recovered, presumptive eradication rates at end of therapy were equivalent: 55 of 65 (84.6%), 54 of 66 (81.8%) and 55 of 66 (83.3%) for cefdinir QD-, cefdinir BID- and amoxicillin/clavulanate-treated patients, respectively. However, presumptive eradication rates for Streptococcus pneumoniae were significantly lower for cefdinir BID (55.2%) than for amoxicillin/clavulanate (89.5%; P = 0.0019) and marginally lower than for cefdinir QD (80%; P = 0.054). Diarrhea was the most common treatment-associated adverse reaction in all groups but was significantly more common in amoxicillin/clavulanate-treated patients (35%) than in patients who had been treated with cefdinir QD (10%, P<0.001) or cefdinir BID (13%, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A 10-day regimen of cefdinir 14 mg/kg QD or 7 mg/kg BID was as clinically effective overall as a 10-day regimen of amoxicillin/ clavulanate 40/10 mg/kg/day divided TID in the treatment of tympanocentesis-confirmed, nonrefractory AOM in children. These data suggest that cefdinir QD may be a better alternative than cefdinir BID for refractory AOM. Both dosing regimens of cefdinir were associated with significantly fewer gastrointestinal adverse reactions than was amoxicillin/clavulanate.

摘要

目的

比较头孢地尼的两种给药方案与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗儿童化脓性急性中耳炎(AOM)的效果。

方法

这是一项研究者设盲、随机、对照、多中心试验,对384例6个月至12岁患有非难治性AOM的患者进行了鼓膜穿刺术。患者被随机分配接受三种10天治疗方案中的一种:头孢地尼每日14mg/kg(QD;n = 128);头孢地尼7mg/kg每日两次(BID;n = 128);或阿莫西林/克拉维酸40/10mg/kg/天,分三次服用(TID;n = 128)。

结果

384例入组患者中,303例可评估临床疗效。治疗结束时,3个治疗组的临床成功率在统计学上相当:头孢地尼QD组102例中的85例(83.3%);头孢地尼BID组101例中的81例(80.2%);阿莫西林/克拉维酸组100例中的86例(86%)。在197例培养出敏感病原体的可评估患者中,治疗结束时推测的根除率相当:头孢地尼QD组65例中的55例(84.6%),头孢地尼BID组66例中的54例(81.8%),阿莫西林/克拉维酸组66例中的55例(83.3%)。然而,头孢地尼BID组肺炎链球菌的推测根除率(55.2%)显著低于阿莫西林/克拉维酸组(89.5%;P = 0.0019),略低于头孢地尼QD组(80%;P = 0.054)。腹泻是所有组中最常见的与治疗相关的不良反应,但在阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗的患者中(35%)明显比头孢地尼QD治疗的患者(10%,P<0.001)和头孢地尼BID治疗的患者(13%,P<0.001)更常见。

结论

在治疗鼓膜穿刺术确诊的儿童非难治性AOM时,10天的头孢地尼14mg/kg QD或7mg/kg BID方案在临床效果上与10天的阿莫西林/克拉维酸40/10mg/kg/天TID方案相当。这些数据表明,对于难治性AOM,头孢地尼QD可能比头孢地尼BID是更好的选择。与阿莫西林/克拉维酸相比,头孢地尼的两种给药方案引起的胃肠道不良反应明显更少。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验