• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本猕猴能感知和弦的感官和谐。

Japanese monkeys perceive sensory consonance of chords.

作者信息

Izumi A

机构信息

Department of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University, Inuyama, Japan.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Dec;108(6):3073-8. doi: 10.1121/1.1323461.

DOI:10.1121/1.1323461
PMID:11144600
Abstract

Consonance/dissonance affects human perception of chords from early stages of development [e.g., Schellenberg and Trainor, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100, 3321-3328 (1996)]. To examine whether consonance has some role in audition of nonhumans, three Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata) were trained to discriminate simultaneous two-tone complexes (chords). The task was serial discrimination (AX procedure) with repetitive presentation of background stimuli. Each tone in a chord was comprised of six harmonics, and chords with complex ratios of fundamental frequency (e.g., frequency ratio of 8:15 in major seventh) resulted in dissonance. The chords were transposed for each presentation to make monkeys attend to cues other than the absolute frequency of a component tone. Monkeys were initially trained to detect changes from consonant (octave) to dissonant (major seventh). Following the successful acquisition of the task, transfer tests with novel chords were conducted. In these transfer tests, the performances with detecting changes from consonant to dissonant chords (perfect fifth to major seventh; perfect fourth to major seventh) were better than those with detecting reverse changes. These results suggested that the consonance of chords affected the performances of monkeys.

摘要

和谐/不和谐从发育早期就会影响人类对和弦的感知[例如,Schellenberg和Trainor,《美国声学学会杂志》100, 3321 - 3328 (1996)]。为了研究和谐在非人类听觉中是否起作用,三只日本猕猴(食蟹猴)被训练来辨别同时出现的双音复合体(和弦)。任务是采用背景刺激重复呈现的序列辨别(AX程序)。和弦中的每个音调由六个谐波组成,具有复杂基频比的和弦(例如,大七度中的频率比8:15)会产生不和谐。每次呈现时和弦都会转调,以使猴子关注除成分音调绝对频率之外的线索。猴子最初被训练检测从和谐(八度)到不和谐(大七度)的变化。在成功掌握任务后,进行了新和弦的迁移测试。在这些迁移测试中,检测从和谐和弦到不和谐和弦(纯五度到大七度;纯四度到大七度)变化的表现优于检测反向变化的表现。这些结果表明和弦的和谐性影响了猴子的表现。

相似文献

1
Japanese monkeys perceive sensory consonance of chords.日本猕猴能感知和弦的感官和谐。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Dec;108(6):3073-8. doi: 10.1121/1.1323461.
2
Consonance and dissonance of musical chords: neural correlates in auditory cortex of monkeys and humans.音乐和弦的协和与不协和:猴子和人类听觉皮层中的神经关联
J Neurophysiol. 2001 Dec;86(6):2761-88. doi: 10.1152/jn.2001.86.6.2761.
3
Phase locked neural activity in the human brainstem predicts preference for musical consonance.人类脑干中的锁相神经活动预测对音乐协和音的偏好。
Neuropsychologia. 2014 May;58(100):23-32. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.03.011. Epub 2014 Mar 29.
4
Consonance and pitch.协和音和音高。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Nov;142(4):1142-58. doi: 10.1037/a0030830. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
5
Deviant consonance and dissonance capture attention differently only when task demand is high: An ERP study with three-stimulus oddball paradigm.只有当任务要求较高时,异常谐音与不和谐音吸引注意力的方式才会有所不同:一项采用三刺激Oddball范式的ERP研究。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2021 Aug;166:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2021.04.008. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
6
Psychoacoustic and experiential determinants of tonal consonance.音调和谐的心理声学和经验决定因素。
J Aud Res. 1980 Jan;20(1):31-42.
7
Mild Dissonance Preferred Over Consonance in Single Chord Perception.单和弦感知中,轻度不和谐比和谐更受青睐。
Iperception. 2016 Jun 27;7(3):2041669516655812. doi: 10.1177/2041669516655812. eCollection 2016 May.
8
Relative pitch perception in Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata).日本猕猴(食蟹猴)的相对音高感知
J Comp Psychol. 2001 Jun;115(2):127-31. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.115.2.127.
9
Newborn infants' auditory system is sensitive to Western music chord categories.新生儿的听觉系统对西方音乐和弦类别敏感。
Front Psychol. 2013 Aug 7;4:492. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00492. eCollection 2013.
10
The variation of hemodynamics relative to listening to consonance or dissonance during chord progression.在和弦进行过程中,相对于聆听协和音或不协和音时血流动力学的变化。
Neurol Res. 2012 Jul;34(6):557-63. doi: 10.1179/1743132812Y.0000000047. Epub 2012 May 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Core systems of music perception.音乐感知的核心系统。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2025 Aug;29(8):763-777. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2025.05.013. Epub 2025 Jun 13.
2
Do Cockatiels Choose Their Favourite Tunes? Use of Touchscreen for Animal Welfare Enhancement and Insights into Musical Preferences.玄凤鹦鹉会选择它们最喜欢的曲调吗?利用触摸屏提升动物福利并洞察音乐偏好。
Animals (Basel). 2024 Dec 14;14(24):3609. doi: 10.3390/ani14243609.
3
Dissonant music engages early visual processing.不和谐音乐能激发早期视觉处理。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jul 23;121(30):e2320378121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2320378121. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
4
The (Co)Evolution of Language and Music Under Human Self-Domestication.人类自我驯化下语言和音乐的(共同)演变。
Hum Nat. 2023 Jun;34(2):229-275. doi: 10.1007/s12110-023-09447-1. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
5
Lessons learned in animal acoustic cognition through comparisons with humans.通过与人类的比较来了解动物的听觉认知。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Jan;26(1):97-116. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01735-0. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
6
Crossmodal Harmony: Looking for the Meaning of Harmony Beyond Hearing.跨模态和谐:探寻超越听觉的和谐之意义
Iperception. 2022 Feb 10;13(1):20416695211073817. doi: 10.1177/20416695211073817. eCollection 2022 Jan-Feb.
7
Is Harmonicity a Misnomer for Cultural Familiarity in Consonance Preferences?和谐性是否是在协和音偏好中文化熟悉度的误称?
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 28;13:802385. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.802385. eCollection 2022.
8
Is consonance attractive to budgerigars? No evidence from a place preference study.共鸣对虎皮鹦鹉有吸引力吗?来自偏好位置研究的证据。
Anim Cogn. 2020 Sep;23(5):973-987. doi: 10.1007/s10071-020-01404-0. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
9
Perceptual fusion of musical notes by native Amazonians suggests universal representations of musical intervals.本地亚马孙人对音符的感知融合表明了音乐音程的普遍表现形式。
Nat Commun. 2020 Jun 3;11(1):2786. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16448-6.
10
Simultaneous consonance in music perception and composition.音乐感知和创作中的同时协和。
Psychol Rev. 2020 Mar;127(2):216-244. doi: 10.1037/rev0000169. Epub 2019 Dec 23.