Foster M, Fleming J, Tilse C, Rosenman L
School of Social Work and Social Policy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Brain Inj. 2000 Dec;14(12):1035-45. doi: 10.1080/02699050050203531.
The study aimed to describe the types of care allocated at the end of acute care to people diagnosed with TBI and to identify the factors associated with variations in referral to care. A retrospective analysis of medical records of 61 patients was conducted based on a sample from two hospitals. While 60.7% of the study sample were referred to formal rehabilitation care, this was primarily non-inpatient rehabilitation care (32.8%). Discriminant analysis was used to determine medical and non-medical predictors of referral. Results indicated that place of treatment and age contribute to group differences and were significant in separating the inpatient rehabilitation group from the non-inpatient and no rehabilitation groups. Review by a rehabilitation physician was associated with referral to inpatient rehabilitation but was not adequate to explain referral to non-inpatient rehabilitation. An in-depth exploration of post-acute referral is warranted to improve policy and practice in relation to continuity of care following TBI.
该研究旨在描述急性护理末期分配给创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的护理类型,并确定与转诊护理差异相关的因素。基于两家医院的样本,对61例患者的病历进行了回顾性分析。虽然60.7%的研究样本被转诊至正规康复护理,但主要是非住院康复护理(32.8%)。采用判别分析来确定转诊的医学和非医学预测因素。结果表明,治疗地点和年龄导致了组间差异,并且在区分住院康复组与非住院及无康复组方面具有显著性。康复医师的评估与住院康复转诊相关,但不足以解释非住院康复转诊。有必要对急性后期转诊进行深入探究,以改善TBI后护理连续性方面的政策和实践。