Solaini L, Bagioni P, Prusciano F, Di Francesco F, Poddie D B
Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, S. Maria delle Croci Hospital, Via le Randi 5, 48100 Ravenna, Italy.
Surg Endosc. 2000 Dec;14(12):1142-5. doi: 10.1007/s004640000259.
Indications for the use of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy are a controversial matter. This study aims to provide a retrospective evaluation of VATS lobectomy in typical bronchopulmonary carcinoids.
Patient selection criteria for VATS lobectomy were as follows: (a) typical carcinoids with clear diagnosis; (b) centrally located lung tumors not amenable to bronchial resection with bronchoplastic procedures, or tumors located in peripheral lung tissues; (c) no hilar or mediastinal lymph node enlargement; and (d) normal respiratory function. Between January 1995 and December 1999, 12 patients (eight men and four women with a mean age of 57 years) were treated, seven with a peripheral and five with a centrally located tumor. Preoperative examination included chest roentgenograms, computed tomography (CT) of the chest, bronchoscopy, and spirometry; diagnosis was established by direct bronchoscopy in five cases, transbronchial biopsy in two cases, transthoracic biopsy in two cases, and video thoracoscopic wedge resection in three cases. Eleven VATS lobectomies and one VATS bilobectomy were performed. All patients underwent hilar lymphadenectomy and mediastinal sampling.
There were no intraoperative complications. The only postoperative complication, hematothorax (8.3%), required VATS reoperation. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 5.33 days. Pathological examination of the resected specimens confirmed that the procedure was radical in all 12 patients and revealed eight T1N0 and four T2N0. At a mean follow-up of 30 months, no signs of recurrence were recorded.
VATS lobectomy in the treatment of selected typical carcinoids, both central and peripheral, seems to yield favorable results and is therefore preferable to thoracotomy since it is less invasive.
电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)肺叶切除术的应用指征是一个有争议的问题。本研究旨在对典型支气管肺类癌行VATS肺叶切除术进行回顾性评估。
VATS肺叶切除术的患者选择标准如下:(a)诊断明确的典型类癌;(b)位于中央的肺部肿瘤无法通过支气管成形术进行支气管切除,或位于周边肺组织的肿瘤;(c)无肺门或纵隔淋巴结肿大;(d)呼吸功能正常。1995年1月至1999年12月,共治疗12例患者(8例男性和4例女性,平均年龄57岁),7例为周边型肿瘤,5例为中央型肿瘤。术前检查包括胸部X线片、胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)、支气管镜检查和肺功能测定;5例通过直接支气管镜检查确诊,2例通过经支气管活检确诊,2例通过经胸壁活检确诊,3例通过电视胸腔镜楔形切除术确诊。行11例VATS肺叶切除术和1例VATS双叶切除术。所有患者均行肺门淋巴结清扫和纵隔取样。
术中无并发症。唯一的术后并发症为血胸(8.3%),需行VATS再次手术。术后平均住院时间为5.33天。切除标本的病理检查证实,所有12例患者的手术均为根治性,显示8例T1N0和4例T2N0。平均随访30个月,未记录到复发迹象。
VATS肺叶切除术治疗选定的中央型和周边型典型类癌似乎能取得良好效果,因此比开胸手术更可取,因为它的侵入性较小。