Suppr超能文献

用于比较发育迟缓与非发育迟缓受试者的操纵变量设计的替代方法。

Alternatives to the design of manipulating a variable to compare retarded and nonretarded subjects.

作者信息

Chapman L J, Chapman J P

出版信息

Am J Ment Defic. 1975 Jan;79(4):404-11.

PMID:1115098
Abstract

In the design of manipulating a single variable to compare the performance of retarded and nonretarded subjects, the groups' response to the variable cannot demonstrate a loss of ability of retarded subjects. This is because tasks (measures at points on the variable) which differ on difficulty or on reliability also differ in power to distinguish subjects of differing ability. A solution is to hypothesize a differential deficit (greater deficit in response to one variable than another) and manipulate two variables. The tasks should be matched at all difficulty levels on reliability, mean, and variance of item difficulty and shape of the distribution of item difficulty.

摘要

在设计操纵单个变量以比较智力迟钝和非智力迟钝受试者的表现时,两组对该变量的反应不能表明智力迟钝受试者能力的丧失。这是因为在难度或信度上不同的任务(变量上各点的测量)在区分不同能力受试者的效力上也不同。一种解决办法是假设存在差异缺陷(对一个变量的反应比另一个变量有更大的缺陷)并操纵两个变量。这些任务应在所有难度水平上在信度、项目难度的均值和方差以及项目难度分布形状方面进行匹配。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验