Wilson L G, Shore J H
Am J Psychiatry. 1975 Mar;132(3):255-8. doi: 10.1176/ajp.132.3.255.
The authors analyzed follow-up data collected by an Indian counselor and a psychiatrist on 83 American Indian alcoholic men. Follow-up status was judged by an interdisciplinary panel according to a six-step rating scale. The 44 percent improvement rate compares favorably with other treatment programs, especially in view of the selection process, which favored difficult patients. The authors suggest that the interdisciplinary rating panel is an approach that can prevent erroneous judgments of the drinking status of American Indians.
作者分析了一名印度顾问和一名精神科医生收集的83名美国印第安酗酒男性的随访数据。随访状态由一个跨学科小组根据一个六步评级量表进行判断。44%的改善率与其他治疗项目相比很可观，尤其是考虑到选择过程偏向于病情较重的患者。作者认为跨学科评级小组是一种可以防止对美国印第安人饮酒状况做出错误判断的方法。
