Janssens H M, Heijnen E M, de Jong V M, Hop W C, Holland W P, de Jongste J C, Tiddens H A
Dept of Paediatrics, Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur Respir J. 2000 Nov;16(5):850-6. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00.16585000.
The aims of this study were to assess and compare dose delivery and dose variability of pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDI)/spacers in wheezy infants in daily life and to investigate factors influencing aerosol delivery. In an open randomized crossover study in 25 wheezy infants aged 5-26 months, a metal spacer (Nebuchamber), a detergent coated (DC) and a non-detergent coated (nonDC) plastic spacer (Babyhaler) were tested at home for 7 days each. Budesonide (200 microg b.i.d) was administered via a Nebuchamber or fluticasone (125 microg b.i.d) via a Babyhaler. Aerosol was trapped in filters, positioned between the spacer and face mask. Cooperation was scored on diary cards. Electrostatic charge (ESC) of the spacers was measured. Evaluations of the administration technique were made from video recordings. Median (range) dose delivery of the filters expressed as per cent (%) of nominal dose, was 34% (3-59), 23% (1-49), and 41% (12-55) for the Nebuchamber, nonDC-Babyhaler, and DC-Babyhaler respectively. Considerable dose variability was found, median (range) within-subject dose variability, expressed as coefficient of variation, for the Nebuchamber (49% (15-249)) was significantly higher when compared with both nonDC- (36% (12-325)) and DC-Babyhalers (27% (10-122)), for which dose variabilities were similar. Detergent coating was effective to reduce electrostatic charge, and to increase dose delivery, but had no effect on dose variability. Bad cooperation was an important cause for high dose variability for all spacers (r=0.5-0.6, p<0.02). Many mistakes were made during the administration procedure.
本研究的目的是评估和比较压力定量吸入器(pMDI)/储物罐在喘息婴儿日常生活中的剂量输送和剂量变异性,并调查影响气雾剂输送的因素。在一项针对25名年龄在5至26个月的喘息婴儿的开放性随机交叉研究中,分别对金属储物罐(Nebuchamber)、涂有洗涤剂(DC)和未涂有洗涤剂(nonDC)的塑料储物罐(Babyhaler)进行了为期7天的家庭测试。通过Nebuchamber给予布地奈德(200微克,每日两次),或通过Babyhaler给予氟替卡松(125微克,每日两次)。气雾剂被捕集在位于储物罐和面罩之间的过滤器中。在日记卡上对配合情况进行评分。测量储物罐的静电荷(ESC)。根据视频记录对给药技术进行评估。以名义剂量的百分比(%)表示的过滤器中位(范围)剂量输送,Nebuchamber为34%(3 - 59),nonDC - Babyhaler为23%(1 - 49),DC - Babyhaler为41%(12 - 55)。发现存在相当大的剂量变异性,以变异系数表示的Nebuchamber的中位(范围)受试者内剂量变异性(49%(15 - 249))与nonDC - Babyhaler(36%(12 - 325))和DC - Babyhaler(27%(10 - 122))相比显著更高,而后两者的剂量变异性相似。洗涤剂涂层有效地减少了静电荷并增加了剂量输送,但对剂量变异性没有影响。配合不佳是所有储物罐剂量变异性高的一个重要原因(r = 0.5 - 0.6,p < 0.02)。给药过程中出现了许多错误。