Suppr超能文献

通过压力定量吸入器-储物罐向幼儿输送气雾剂:面罩设计重要吗?

Aerosol delivery to young children by pMDI-spacer: is facemask design important?

作者信息

Esposito-Festen José, Ates Bahar, van Vliet Frans, Hop Wim, Tiddens Harm

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center/Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2005 Jun;16(4):348-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2005.00285.x.

Abstract

This study aimed at identifying in a daily-life setting the influence of facemask design on drug delivery via a spacer to young children. In a 4-week randomized crossover study, 24 children (7-23-months old) with recurrent wheeze tested the AstraZeneca, Galemed, and Hans Rudolph facemask combined with the NebuChamber at home. Each mask was tested twice daily for seven consecutive days. Filters positioned between the NebuChamber and facemask trapped the budesonide aerosol (200 microg, Pulmicort). Parents were asked to score the child's degree of cooperation during administration on diary cards. The administration procedure was evaluated through video recordings. Mean filter dose (standard deviation (s.d.)), expressed as % of nominal dose, was 39% (14), 47% (12), and 42% (11) for the AstraZeneca, the Galemed and the Hans Rudolph mask, respectively. Irrespective of the degree of cooperation, the Galemed mask gave significantly higher mean filter doses than the other masks (level of significance) (p < 0.045). Median (range) within-subject dose variability, expressed, as coefficient of variation (CV), was 37% (19-255), 32% (9-114), and 30% (9-115) for the AstraZeneca mask, the Galemed mask and the Hans Rudolph mask, respectively, not significant. Dose variability increased with decreasing cooperation for all three masks (p = 0.007). Drug delivery to young children with recurrent wheeze by means of the NebuChamber can be enhanced using the Galemed facemask. Dose variability seems to be independent of facemask design but mainly depends on cooperation.

摘要

本研究旨在确定在日常生活环境中,面罩设计对通过 spacer 给幼儿给药的影响。在一项为期 4 周的随机交叉研究中,24 名(7 - 23 个月大)反复喘息的儿童在家中测试了阿斯利康、Galemed 和汉斯·鲁道夫面罩与雾化器(NebuChamber)组合的效果。每个面罩连续 7 天每天测试两次。置于雾化器和面罩之间的过滤器捕获布地奈德气雾剂(200 微克,普米克)。要求家长在日记卡上对面部给药期间孩子的合作程度进行评分。通过录像对给药过程进行评估。以标称剂量的百分比表示的平均过滤器剂量(标准差(s.d.)),阿斯利康、Galemed 和汉斯·鲁道夫面罩分别为 39%(14)、47%(12)和 42%(11)。无论合作程度如何,Galemed 面罩的平均过滤器剂量均显著高于其他面罩(显著性水平)(p < 0.045)。以变异系数(CV)表示的受试者内剂量变异性中位数(范围),阿斯利康面罩、Galemed 面罩和汉斯·鲁道夫面罩分别为 37%(19 - 255)、32%(9 - 114)和 30%(9 - 115),差异不显著。所有三种面罩的剂量变异性均随合作程度降低而增加(p = 0.007)。使用 Galemed 面罩可增强通过雾化器给反复喘息幼儿给药的效果。剂量变异性似乎与面罩设计无关,主要取决于合作程度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验