Suppr超能文献

肩关节置换术后感染。

Infection after shoulder arthroplasty.

作者信息

Sperling J W, Kozak T K, Hanssen A D, Cofield R H

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Mayo Clinic/Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Jan(382):206-16. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200101000-00028.

Abstract

Between 1972 and 1994, 2279 patients underwent primary shoulder arthroplasty (2512 shoulders) and 194 patients underwent revision shoulder arthroplasty (222 shoulders) at the authors' institution. Of these, 18 patients with primary shoulder arthroplasties (19 shoulders) and seven patients with revision shoulder arthroplasties (seven shoulders) were diagnosed with deep periprosthetic infection. Additionally, during this period, seven patients (seven shoulders) with primary shoulder arthroplasties and one patient (one shoulder) with a previously revised shoulder arthroplasty were referred to the authors' institution for treatment of deep periprosthetic infection. Two patients (two shoulders) were excluded because of incomplete medical records and with component removal performed elsewhere. The average time from arthroplasty to the diagnosis of infection was 3.5 years (range, 0-14.8 years). The patients were divided into four groups on the basis of treatment. Group I comprised 20 patients (21 shoulders) who underwent resection arthroplasty. Six of the 21 shoulders had additional episodes of infection. Group II comprised six patients (six shoulders) who underwent debridement and prosthetic retention. Three of the six shoulders failed this treatment with subsequent reinfection and underwent a resection arthroplasty. Group III comprised two patients (two shoulders) who had removal of the prosthesis, debridement, and immediate reimplantation. One patient underwent resection arthroplasty 9 months after direct exchange because of reinfection. Group IV comprised three patients (three shoulders) who had removal of the prosthesis, debridement, and delayed reimplantation. Reinfection has not occurred in any of these patients. At final followup, patients with a prosthesis in situ had better pain relief and shoulder function than patients treated with resection arthroplasty. Delayed reimplantation may offer the best hope for pain relief, eradication of infection, and maintenance of shoulder function.

摘要

1972年至1994年间,在作者所在机构,2279例患者接受了初次肩关节置换术(2512肩),194例患者接受了翻修肩关节置换术(222肩)。其中,18例初次肩关节置换术患者(19肩)和7例翻修肩关节置换术患者(7肩)被诊断为假体周围深部感染。此外,在此期间,7例初次肩关节置换术患者(7肩)和1例曾接受翻修肩关节置换术的患者(1肩)因假体周围深部感染被转诊至作者所在机构。2例患者(2肩)因病历不完整且假体取出在其他地方进行而被排除。从关节置换术到感染诊断的平均时间为3.5年(范围0 - 14.8年)。根据治疗方法将患者分为四组。第一组包括20例患者(21肩),他们接受了切除关节成形术。21肩中有6肩出现了额外的感染发作。第二组包括6例患者(6肩),他们接受了清创和假体保留治疗。6肩中有3肩这种治疗失败,随后再次感染并接受了切除关节成形术。第三组包括2例患者(2肩),他们进行了假体取出、清创并立即重新植入。1例患者在直接置换9个月后因再次感染接受了切除关节成形术。第四组包括3例患者(3肩),他们进行了假体取出、清创并延迟重新植入。这些患者均未发生再次感染。在最后随访时,原位保留假体的患者比接受切除关节成形术治疗的患者疼痛缓解更好,肩关节功能更佳。延迟重新植入可能为缓解疼痛、根除感染和维持肩关节功能提供最大希望。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验