Frim D M, Lathrop D
Section of Pediatric Neurosurgery, The University of Chicago Children's Hospital, Chicago, Ill., USA.
Pediatr Neurosurg. 2000 Nov;33(5):237-242. doi: 10.1159/000055961.
Noninvasive manipulation of programmable shunt valves may allow customization of intracranial pressure (ICP) dynamics in individual shunted patients. Manipulations of the recently FDA-approved Codman-Medos variable pressure valve (VPV) are monitored by radiographic changes in the valve mechanism, necessitating a skull radiograph with each pressure change. We wished to assess the in vivo impact of VPV manipulations on ICP changes using a noninvasive telemonitor as an alternative to radiographic confirmation and as a method for validating the ICP changes.
TeleSensor devices (Radionics) were implanted in-line with 12 VPV shunt systems. ICP was assessed telemetrically in the supine position whenever the valve pressure was adjusted (both before and 2-5 min after the manipulation).
Valve manipulation was confirmed by radiograph for the initial manipulations only and matched the telemetric pressure changes observed in all cases. Confirmed manipulations of the valve were generally followed by a near equivalent relative change in ICP (</=2 cm difference 74% of the time); however, the absolute value of the supine ICP was dependent on the entire shunting system and was equivalent to the valve setting only 11% of the time. Supine ICP and ICP dynamics were also dependent more on the shunt system than simply on the valve setting and were different for each of the shunt systems tested.
We have confirmed that the VPV does cause ICP changes in shunted hydrocephalic patients that are essentially equivalent to programmed relative changes in the valve settings. These changes can be as easily monitored by noninvasive telemetry as by repeated radiography. However, our observations demonstrate that additional factors in the shunting system render the ICP absolutely equivalent to the VPV setting only rarely, implying that a programmable shunt valve is not necessarily equivalent to programmable ICP.
对可编程分流阀进行无创操作可能会使分流患者的颅内压(ICP)动态变化实现个体化定制。最近获得美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的Codman - Medos可变压力阀(VPV)的操作通过阀门机制的放射学变化进行监测,每次压力变化都需要进行颅骨X光检查。我们希望使用无创遥测技术评估VPV操作对ICP变化的体内影响,以此替代放射学确认,并作为验证ICP变化的一种方法。
将遥测传感器设备(Radionics公司)与12个VPV分流系统串联植入。每当调整阀门压力时(操作前及操作后2 - 5分钟),均在仰卧位通过遥测法评估ICP。
仅在初始操作时通过X光片确认了阀门操作,且与所有病例中观察到的遥测压力变化相符。确认的阀门操作通常随后会出现近乎等效的ICP相对变化(74%的时间内差异≤2 cm);然而,仰卧位ICP的绝对值取决于整个分流系统,仅11%的时间与阀门设置等效。仰卧位ICP和ICP动态变化也更多地取决于分流系统,而不仅仅取决于阀门设置,并且在每个测试的分流系统中都有所不同。
我们已证实,VPV确实会使分流性脑积水患者的ICP发生变化,这些变化与阀门设置中编程的相对变化基本等效。这些变化通过无创遥测技术监测与通过反复进行X光检查一样容易。然而,我们的观察结果表明,分流系统中的其他因素使得ICP仅在极少数情况下与VPV设置绝对等效,这意味着可编程分流阀不一定等同于可编程ICP。