van Bokhorst-De Van Der Schueren M A, Quak J J, von Blomberg-van der Flier B M, Kuik D J, Langendoen S I, Snow G B, Green C J, van Leeuwen P A
Department of Dietetics, the Nutrition Support Team, University Hospital Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2001 Feb;73(2):323-32. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/73.2.323.
Malnourished head and neck cancer patients are at increased risk of postoperative complications.
We studied the effect of perioperative, arginine-supplemented nutritional support on nutritional status, immune status, postoperative outcome, and survival in severely malnourished (weight loss >10% of body weight) head and neck cancer patients undergoing major surgery.
Forty-nine patients were randomly assigned to receive 1) no preoperative and standard postoperative tube feeding, 2) standard preoperative and postoperative tube feeding, or 3) arginine-supplemented preoperative and postoperative tube feeding.
Patients in both prefed groups received approximately 9 d of preoperative tube feeding, resulting in energy intakes of 110% and 113% of calculated needs (compared with 79% in the control group; P = 0.007). Compared with no preoperative feeding, preoperative enteral nutrition did not significantly improve nutritional status or any of the studied biochemical or immunologic indexes. Major postoperative complications occurred in 53%, 47%, and 59% of patients in study groups 1, 2, and 3 (NS). A trend was seen toward better survival in the arginine-supplemented group (P = 0.15). Secondary analysis showed that survivors had better human leukocyte antigen-DR expression on monocytes (P = 0.05) and higher endotoxin-induced cytokine production (P = 0.010 for tumor necrosis factor alpha and P = 0.042 for interleukin 6) at the start of the study than did patients who died.
Nine days of preoperative tube feeding, with or without arginine, did not significantly improve nutritional status, reduce the surgery-induced immune suppression, or affect clinical outcome in severely malnourished head and neck cancer patients. Patients supplemented with arginine-enriched nutrition tended to live longer. Some markers of immune function may distinguish patients with good or bad prognoses.
营养不良的头颈癌患者术后并发症风险增加。
我们研究了围手术期补充精氨酸的营养支持对接受大手术的严重营养不良(体重减轻超过体重10%)的头颈癌患者营养状况、免疫状态、术后结局和生存的影响。
49例患者被随机分配接受以下治疗:1)术前不进行管饲且术后进行标准管饲;2)术前和术后均进行标准管饲;3)术前和术后均进行补充精氨酸的管饲。
两个预饲组的患者术前均接受了约9天的管饲,能量摄入量分别为计算需求量的110%和113%(对照组为79%;P = 0.007)。与术前未进行管饲相比,术前肠内营养并未显著改善营养状况或任何所研究的生化或免疫指标。研究组1、2和3中分别有53%、47%和59%的患者发生了严重术后并发症(无显著差异)。补充精氨酸组有生存改善的趋势(P = 0.15)。二次分析显示,与死亡患者相比,研究开始时幸存者单核细胞上的人类白细胞抗原-DR表达更高(P = 0.05),内毒素诱导的细胞因子产生更高(肿瘤坏死因子α为P = 0.010,白细胞介素6为P = 0.042)。
9天的术前管饲,无论是否补充精氨酸,均未显著改善严重营养不良的头颈癌患者的营养状况、减轻手术诱导的免疫抑制或影响临床结局。补充富含精氨酸营养的患者生存期有延长趋势。一些免疫功能标志物可能区分预后良好或不良的患者。