Courtney S E, Pyon K H, Saslow J G, Arnold G K, Pandit P B, Habib R H
Robert Wood Johnson Medical School at Camden and the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, the Children's Regional Hospital at Cooper Hospital/University Medical Center, Camden, New Jersey 08103, USA.
Pediatrics. 2001 Feb;107(2):304-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.2.304.
To determine whether lung volume changes and breathing pattern parameters differ among 3 devices for delivery of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in premature infants.
Thirty-two premature infants receiving nasal CPAP for apnea or mild respiratory distress were enrolled. Birth weight was (mean +/- standard deviation) 1081 +/- 316 g, gestational age 29 +/- 2 weeks, age at study 13 +/- 12 days, and fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO(2)) at study.29 +/-.1. Three devices, applied in random order, were studied in each infant: continuous flow nasal CPAP via CPAP prongs, continuous flow nasal CPAP via modified nasal cannula, and variable flow nasal CPAP. After lung recruitment to standardize volume history, changes in lung volume (DeltaV(L)) were assessed at nasal CPAP of 8, 6, 4, and 0 cm H(2)O using calibrated direct current-coupled respiratory inductance plethysmography.
DeltaV(L) was significantly greater overall with the variable flow device compared with both the nasal cannula and CPAP prongs. However, DeltaV(L) was not different between the cannula and the prongs. Respiratory rate, tidal volume, thoraco-abdominal asynchrony, and FIO(2) were greater with the modified cannula than for either of the other 2 devices.
Compared with 2 continuous flow devices, the variable flow nasal CPAP device leads to greater lung recruitment. Although a nasal cannula is able to recruit lung volume, it does so at the cost of increased respiratory effort and FIO(2).
确定三种用于早产儿鼻持续气道正压通气(CPAP)的设备在肺容量变化和呼吸模式参数方面是否存在差异。
纳入32例因呼吸暂停或轻度呼吸窘迫接受鼻CPAP治疗的早产儿。出生体重为(均值±标准差)1081±316g,胎龄29±2周,研究时年龄13±12天,研究时吸入氧分数(FIO₂)为0.29±0.1。对每个婴儿以随机顺序应用三种设备进行研究:通过CPAP管芯的持续气流鼻CPAP、通过改良鼻导管的持续气流鼻CPAP和可变气流鼻CPAP。在肺复张使肺容量历史标准化后,使用校准的直流耦合呼吸感应体积描记法在8、6、4和0cm H₂O的鼻CPAP水平评估肺容量变化(ΔVₗ)。
与鼻导管和CPAP管芯相比,可变气流设备的总体ΔVₗ显著更大。然而,鼻导管和CPAP管芯之间的ΔVₗ没有差异。改良鼻导管的呼吸频率、潮气量、胸腹不同步和FIO₂均高于其他两种设备。
与两种持续气流设备相比,可变气流鼻CPAP设备可导致更大程度的肺复张。虽然鼻导管能够使肺容量增加,但其代价是呼吸功和FIO₂增加。