Suppr超能文献

幽门螺杆菌与非甾体抗炎药:与质子泵抑制剂疗法相互作用以预防非甾体抗炎药溃疡及溃疡并发症——未来研究需求

Helicobacter pylori and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: interaction with proton pump inhibitor therapy for prevention of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug ulcers and ulcer complications--future research needs.

作者信息

Graham D Y

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.

出版信息

Am J Med. 2001 Jan 8;110(1A):58S-61S. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00644-6.

Abstract

Two recently reported studies of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), the Omeprazole versus Misoprostol for NSAID-induced Ulcer Management and the Acid Suppression Trial: Ranitidine versus Omeprazole for NSAID-associated Ulcer Treatment studies, concluded that omeprazole was superior to a subtherapeutic misoprostol or an ineffective dose of ranitidine for the endpoint, prevention of gastroduodenal ulcers in chronic NSAID users. Helicobacter pylori status was collected prospectively but was not reported. We report separate analyses for patients with unequivocal NSAID ulcers (H. pylori negative) and patients whose NSAID use was complicated by the presence of an active H. pylori infection. Omeprazole was superior to placebo for the prevention of ulcer recurrence in chronic NSAID users. However, omeprazole was not significantly better than a subtherapeutic dose of misoprostol for the prevention of gastroduodenal ulcers in chronic NSAID users. Misoprostol was superior to omeprazole for the prevention of gastric ulcers among those patients with unequivocal NSAID ulcers (8.2% vs 16.6%, respectively; P <0.05). Omeprazole was not statistically different from misoprostol for gastric ulcer prevention in those whose NSAID use was complicated by an active H. pylori infection. Ranitidine and omeprazole were also not statistically different for the prevention of unequivocal NSAID gastric ulcers (14.6% vs 11.6%, respectively; P = 0.56). That the Misoprostol Ulcer Complications Outcomes Safety Assessment (MUCOSA) trial found full-dose misoprostol to be more effective in ulcer prevention than it was in prevention of ulcer complications suggests that either many of the ulcer complications were related to H. pylori ulcers or that more antisecretory activity than can be provided with misoprostol is needed, or both. The question remains whether the combination of low-dose misoprostol plus an antisecretory drug (either an H(2)-receptor antagonist or a proton pump inhibitor) would provide superior results compared with either alone. That omeprazole was not superior to one half the dose of misoprostol used in the ulcer complication prevention, or MUCOSA, study indicates that it would not be prudent to suggest that ulcer prevention with omeprazole alone would be able to provide similar protection to misoprostol.

摘要

最近有两项关于非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)的研究,即奥美拉唑与米索前列醇用于NSAIDs所致溃疡治疗的研究以及抑酸试验:雷尼替丁与奥美拉唑用于NSAIDs相关性溃疡治疗的研究,得出结论认为,对于慢性NSAIDs使用者预防胃十二指肠溃疡这一终点而言,奥美拉唑优于亚治疗剂量的米索前列醇或无效剂量的雷尼替丁。幽门螺杆菌状态是前瞻性收集的,但未报告。我们报告了对明确患有NSAIDs溃疡(幽门螺杆菌阴性)的患者以及NSAIDs使用因存在活动性幽门螺杆菌感染而复杂化的患者的单独分析。奥美拉唑在预防慢性NSAIDs使用者溃疡复发方面优于安慰剂。然而,在预防慢性NSAIDs使用者胃十二指肠溃疡方面,奥美拉唑并不显著优于亚治疗剂量的米索前列醇。在明确患有NSAIDs溃疡的患者中,米索前列醇在预防胃溃疡方面优于奥美拉唑(分别为8.2%对16.6%;P<0.05)。在NSAIDs使用因活动性幽门螺杆菌感染而复杂化的患者中,奥美拉唑在预防胃溃疡方面与米索前列醇无统计学差异。雷尼替丁和奥美拉唑在预防明确的NSAIDs胃溃疡方面也无统计学差异(分别为14.6%对11.6%;P = 0.56)。米索前列醇溃疡并发症结局安全性评估(MUCOSA)试验发现全剂量米索前列醇在预防溃疡方面比预防溃疡并发症更有效,这表明要么许多溃疡并发症与幽门螺杆菌溃疡有关,要么需要比米索前列醇所能提供的更多的抑酸活性,或者两者皆需。低剂量米索前列醇加一种抑酸药物(H₂受体拮抗剂或质子泵抑制剂)联合使用是否会比单独使用任何一种药物产生更好的结果,这一问题仍然存在。奥美拉唑并不优于溃疡并发症预防研究(即MUCOSA研究)中所用米索前列醇剂量的一半,这表明仅用奥美拉唑预防溃疡就能提供与米索前列醇类似的保护,这种说法并不谨慎。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验