产科中的循证医学
Evidence-based medicine in obstetrics.
作者信息
Johanson R, Lucking L
机构信息
Academic Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, North Staffordshire Hospital NHS Trust, Newcastle, UK.
出版信息
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001 Feb;72(2):179-85. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(00)00288-5.
OBJECTIVES
The main objectives of this study were to determine: (a) the most popular sources of educational material for use in obstetrics, and the relative values assigned to these; (b) the relative importance of current evidence-based medicine (EBM) activities including use of guidelines and audits; and (c) worldwide practice in respect of 4 RCOG audit recommendations.
METHODS
A postal questionnaire was distributed to 2472 obstetricians/gynecologists worldwide.
RESULTS
A total of 1090 questionnaires were returned. The results found broad support for the principles of EBM, with most clinicians having access to electronic databases, and using guidelines and audits. There was wide interest in further research in suggested key areas.
CONCLUSION
The traditional reliance on meetings, reviews and colleagues' opinion continues, indicating that further research must be undertaken to optimize these educational opportunities.
目的
本研究的主要目的是确定：（a）产科使用的最受欢迎的教育材料来源以及赋予这些来源的相对价值；（b）当前循证医学（EBM）活动（包括使用指南和审计）的相对重要性；以及（c）全球范围内对皇家妇产科医师学院（RCOG）4项审计建议的实践情况。
方法
向全球2472名产科医生/妇科医生发放了邮政问卷。
结果
共收回1090份问卷。结果发现对循证医学原则有广泛支持，大多数临床医生可以访问电子数据库，并使用指南和审计。对建议的关键领域的进一步研究有广泛兴趣。
结论
对会议、综述和同事意见的传统依赖仍然存在，这表明必须进行进一步研究以优化这些教育机会。
Zotero 插件