Suppr超能文献

听觉与视觉分心效应的比较:行为学及事件相关指标

A comparison of auditory and visual distraction effects: behavioral and event-related indices.

作者信息

Berti S, Schröger E

机构信息

Institut für Allgemeine Psychologie, Universität Leipzig, Seeburgstr. 14-20, D-04103, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2001 Jan;10(3):265-73. doi: 10.1016/s0926-6410(00)00044-6.

Abstract

Infrequent task-irrelevant deviations in the frequency of a tone may distract our attention away from the processing of task-relevant tone duration. The distraction obtained in the auditory paradigm is reflected in prolonged reaction times in duration discrimination and in P3a. The P3a is followed by a late negative component, which may be related to a re-orienting process following distraction (RON, re-orienting negativity). The present study aimed at comparing effects of the auditory and a corresponding visual distraction paradigm. Distraction elicited a deviance-related negativity which revealed a modality-specific distribution. It was followed by P3a (350-ms post-stimulus) and by RON (500-ms post-stimulus). RON did not occur with long-duration visual stimuli indicating a difference in visual and auditory distraction. Moreover, the results suggest that in both tasks irrelevant deviants were detected by modality-specific processes which caused an attention shift.

摘要

音调频率中不常见的与任务无关的偏差可能会将我们的注意力从与任务相关的音调持续时间的处理上转移开。在听觉范式中获得的分心效应反映在持续时间辨别中的反应时间延长以及P3a中。P3a之后是一个晚期负成分,这可能与分心后的重新定向过程有关(RON,重新定向负波)。本研究旨在比较听觉和相应视觉分心范式的效果。分心引发了一种与偏差相关的负波,其显示出特定模态的分布。随后是P3a(刺激后350毫秒)和RON(刺激后500毫秒)。长时间视觉刺激未出现RON,表明视觉和听觉分心存在差异。此外,结果表明在这两个任务中,无关偏差都是通过导致注意力转移的特定模态过程检测到的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验