• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

感官预测违背引起的分心:异常声音和意外静音之间的功能区别。

Distraction by violation of sensory predictions: Functional distinction between deviant sounds and unexpected silences.

机构信息

Department of Psychology & Research Institute of Health Sciences, Neuropsychology & Cognition Group, University of the Balearic Islands, Palma, Balearic Islands, Spain.

Balearic Islands Health Research Institute (IdISBa), Palma, Balearic Islands, Spain.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Sep 6;17(9):e0274188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274188. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0274188
PMID:36067181
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9447928/
Abstract

It has been established that participants performing a continuous categorization task respond significantly slower following the presentation of unexpected, task-irrelevant, auditory stimuli, compared to a repetitive (standard) sound. Evidence indicates that such distraction emerges because of the violation of sensory predictions. This has typically been studied by measuring the impact of replacing the repeated sound by a different sound on rare and unpredictable trials. Here, we examine the impact of a different type of violation: the mere omission of the standard sound. Capitalizing upon the recent finding that deviant sounds exert distinct effects on response times as a function of whether participants produced or withheld a response on the previous trial, we present the results of an experiment seeking to disentangle two potential effects of sound omission: deviance distraction and the removal of an unspecific warning signal. The results indicate that deviant sound and the unexpected omission of the standard sound impact response times through, at least partially, distinct mechanisms. Deviant sounds affect performance by triggering the orienting of attention towards a new sensory input. Sound omissions, in contrast, appear to affect performance in part because responses no longer benefit from an unspecific warning signal to prepare for action.

摘要

已经确定,与重复(标准)声音相比,参与者在呈现意外的、与任务无关的听觉刺激后,执行连续分类任务的反应速度会显著减慢。有证据表明,这种分心是由于违反了感官预测而产生的。这通常通过测量在罕见和不可预测的试验中用不同的声音代替重复声音对反应时间的影响来研究。在这里,我们研究了另一种类型的违反:仅仅省略标准声音。利用最近的发现,即偏差声音会根据参与者在前一个试验中是做出反应还是抑制反应而对反应时间产生不同的影响,我们进行了一项实验,旨在区分标准声音的缺失的两种潜在影响:偏差干扰和消除非特定的警告信号。结果表明,偏差声音和标准声音的意外缺失会通过至少部分不同的机制影响反应时间。偏差声音通过触发注意力朝向新的感官输入来影响性能。相比之下,声音缺失似乎会影响性能,部分原因是响应不再受益于特定的警告信号来准备行动。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee9d/9447928/f900b23b99a1/pone.0274188.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee9d/9447928/f900b23b99a1/pone.0274188.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee9d/9447928/f900b23b99a1/pone.0274188.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Distraction by violation of sensory predictions: Functional distinction between deviant sounds and unexpected silences.感官预测违背引起的分心:异常声音和意外静音之间的功能区别。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 6;17(9):e0274188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274188. eCollection 2022.
2
Distraction by deviant sounds is modulated by the environmental context.偏离声音的干扰会被环境背景所调节。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 12;12(1):21447. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25500-y.
3
The cognitive determinants of behavioral distraction by deviant auditory stimuli: a review.异常听觉刺激导致行为分心的认知决定因素:综述
Psychol Res. 2014;78(3):321-38. doi: 10.1007/s00426-013-0534-4. Epub 2013 Dec 21.
4
Sadness increases distraction by auditory deviant stimuli.悲伤会增加对听觉偏差刺激的分心。
Emotion. 2014 Feb;14(1):203-13. doi: 10.1037/a0034289. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
5
Behavioral distraction by auditory deviance is mediated by the sound's informational value. Evidence from an auditory discrimination task.听觉偏差引起的行为分心由声音的信息价值介导。来自听觉辨别任务的证据。
Exp Psychol. 2013;60(4):260-8. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000196.
6
Cognitive control of involuntary distraction by deviant sounds.对异常声音的非自愿分心的认知控制。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Sep;39(5):1635-41. doi: 10.1037/a0032421. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
7
Distraction by deviant sounds during reading: An eye-movement study.阅读过程中异常声音的干扰:一项眼动研究。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Jul;72(7):1863-1875. doi: 10.1177/1747021818820816. Epub 2019 Jan 13.
8
Effects of the short-term learned significance of task-irrelevant sounds on involuntary attention in children and adults.与任务无关声音的短期习得意义对儿童和成人非自愿注意的影响。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2015 Oct;98(1):17-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.06.003. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
9
Aging increases distraction by auditory oddballs in visual, but not auditory tasks.衰老会增加视觉任务中听觉异常刺激引起的注意力分散,但在听觉任务中不会。
Psychol Res. 2015 May;79(3):401-10. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0573-5. Epub 2014 May 23.
10
The informational constraints of behavioral distraction by unexpected sounds: the role of event information.行为分心的信息约束:意外声音的作用——事件信息。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Sep;38(5):1461-8. doi: 10.1037/a0028149. Epub 2012 May 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Involuntary motor responses are elicited both by rare sounds and rare pitch changes.非随意运动反应既可以由罕见的声音引起,也可以由罕见的音高变化引起。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 30;14(1):20235. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70776-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Omission related brain responses reflect specific and unspecific action-effect couplings.省略相关的大脑反应反映了特定和非特定的动作-效应耦合。
Neuroimage. 2020 Jul 15;215:116840. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116840. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
2
Is deviance distraction immune to the prior sequential learning of stimuli and responses?偏差分散是否不受先前刺激和反应的序列学习影响?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Jun;27(3):490-497. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01717-8.
3
Task difficulty modulates voluntary attention allocation, but not distraction in an auditory distraction paradigm.
在听觉分心范式中,任务难度会调节自愿注意分配,但不会调节分心情况。
Brain Res. 2020 Jan 15;1727:146565. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2019.146565. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
4
Sleep deprivation moderates neural processes associated with passive auditory capture.睡眠剥夺会调节与被动听觉捕捉相关的神经过程。
Brain Cogn. 2019 Jun;132:89-97. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
5
Distraction by deviant sounds during reading: An eye-movement study.阅读过程中异常声音的干扰:一项眼动研究。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Jul;72(7):1863-1875. doi: 10.1177/1747021818820816. Epub 2019 Jan 13.
6
Surprise as an explanation to auditory novelty distraction and post-error slowing.将惊奇解释为听觉新颖性分心和错误后减速的原因。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Jan;148(1):192-200. doi: 10.1037/xge0000497. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
7
Investigating Deviance Distraction and the Impact of the Modality of the To-Be-Ignored Stimuli.探究偏差干扰以及待忽略刺激的模态影响。
Exp Psychol. 2018 Mar;65(2):61-70. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000390.
8
Perceptual Surprise Improves Action Stopping by Nonselectively Suppressing Motor Activity via a Neural Mechanism for Motor Inhibition.感知惊喜通过一种用于运动抑制的神经机制非选择性地抑制运动活动,从而提高动作停止能力。
J Neurosci. 2018 Feb 7;38(6):1482-1492. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3091-17.2017. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
9
Unexpected events disrupt visuomotor working memory and increase guessing.意外事件会扰乱视觉运动工作记忆并增加猜测行为。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Apr;25(2):651-657. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1319-3.
10
Perceptual surprise aides inhibitory motor control.知觉惊讶有助于抑制性运动控制。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Sep;43(9):1585-1593. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000452. Epub 2017 May 29.