Sand T, Vingen J V
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Trondheim University Hospital, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
Cephalalgia. 2000 Nov;20(9):804-20. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.2000.00098.x.
We aimed to estimate primary sensory evoked potential (EP) amplitude, amplitude-intensity functions and habituation in migraine patients compared with healthy control subjects and to investigate the possible relation to check size, sound and light discomfort thresholds, and the time to the next attack. Amplitudes of cortical visual evoked potentials (VEP, check size 8' and 33'), cortical long latency auditory evoked potential (AEP NIP1; 40, 55 and 70 dB SL tones) and brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP wave IV-V; 40, 55 and 65 dB SL clicks) were recorded and analysed in a blind and balanced design. The difference between the response to the first and the second half of the stimulus sequence was used as a measure of habituation. Twenty-one migraine patients (16 women and five men, mean age 39.3 years, six with aura, 15 without aura) and 22 sex- and age-matched healthy control subjects were studied (18 women and four men, mean age 39.5 years). Low sound discomfort threshold correlated significantly with low levels of BAEP wave IV-V amplitude habituation (r = -0.30, P = 0.05). VEP an AEP amplitudes, habituation, and amplitude-intensity function (ASF) slopes did not differ between groups when ANOVA main factors were considered. Control group VEP habituation was found for small check stimuli (P = 0.04), while potentiation was observed for medium sized checks (P = 0.02). The eight migraine patients who experienced headache within 24 h after the test tended to have increased BAEP wave IV-V ASF slopes (P = 0.08). This subgroup did also have a significant VEP habituation to small checks (P = 0.04). No correlation was found between different modalities. These results suggest that: (i) VEP habituation/potentiation state and brainstem activatio state may depend on the attack-interval cycle in migraine; (ii) VEP habituation/ potentiation may depend on spatial stimulus frequency; (iii) phonophobia (and possibly photophobia) may depend more on subcortical (brainstem) function than on cortical mechanisms; (iv) low cortical preactivation in migraine could not be confirmed; (v) EP habituation and ASF analysis may reflect sensory modality-specific, not generalized, central nervous system states in migraine and healthy control subjects.
我们旨在评估偏头痛患者与健康对照者相比的初级感觉诱发电位(EP)幅度、幅度 - 强度函数和习惯化情况,并研究其与视标大小、声音和光线不适阈值以及下次发作时间的可能关系。采用盲法和均衡设计记录并分析了皮质视觉诱发电位(VEP,视标大小8'和33')、皮质长潜伏期听觉诱发电位(AEP NIP1;40、55和70 dB SL纯音)以及脑干听觉诱发电位(BAEP波IV - V;40、55和65 dB SL短声)的幅度。刺激序列前半段和后半段反应的差异用作习惯化的指标。研究了21例偏头痛患者(16名女性和5名男性,平均年龄39.3岁,6例有先兆,15例无先兆)和22名性别和年龄匹配的健康对照者(18名女性和4名男性,平均年龄39.5岁)。低声不适阈值与BAEP波IV - V幅度习惯化水平低显著相关(r = -0.30,P = 0.05)。当考虑方差分析的主要因素时,两组之间的VEP和AEP幅度、习惯化以及幅度 - 强度函数(ASF)斜率没有差异。对照组小视标刺激存在VEP习惯化(P = 0.04),而中视标刺激观察到增强(P = 0.02)。在测试后24小时内经历头痛的8例偏头痛患者倾向于有增加的BAEP波IV - V ASF斜率(P = 0.08)。该亚组对小视标也有显著的VEP习惯化(P = 0.04)。未发现不同模态之间存在相关性。这些结果表明:(i)VEP习惯化/增强状态和脑干激活状态可能取决于偏头痛的发作间隔周期;(ii)VEP习惯化/增强可能取决于空间刺激频率;(iii)恐声症(可能还有畏光症)可能更多地取决于皮质下(脑干)功能而非皮质机制;(iv)偏头痛中皮质预激活降低无法得到证实;(v)EP习惯化和ASF分析可能反映偏头痛患者和健康对照者中感觉模态特异性而非全身性的中枢神经系统状态。