Berg T, Hoffmann R M, Teuber G, Leifeld L, Lafrenz M, Baumgarten R, Spengler U, Zeuzem S, Pape G R, Hopf U
Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt, Hepatologie und Gastroenterologie, Universitätsklinikum Charité, Humboldt-Universität, Berlin, Germany.
Liver. 2000 Dec;20(6):427-36. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0676.2000.020006427.x.
Combination therapy with interferon alpha (IFNalpha) plus ribavirin has been shown to improve the sustained response rate in patients with chronic hepatitis C but there is little information regarding the lengths of time for this therapeutic regimen. In this study we therefore tried to evaluate whether the analysis of different virological parameters could provide new clues with respect to the early determination of the efficacy of this form of combination therapy. Furthermore, we also examined whether short-term induction combination therapy followed by IFNalpha alone is more effective than monotherapy in mounting an initial as well as a sustained virological response.
185 patients with histologically proven chronic hepatitis C (mean age 42 years (range 19-65 years); 110 males, 75 females) were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to receive, over the first 12 weeks, either interferon alpha 2a 6 million units (MU) three times weekly plus ribavirin 14 mg/kg per day (n=93) or the same dose of IFNalpha alone (n=92). Patients with a virological response (serum HCV RNA undetectable) after 12 weeks were subsequently treated with 3 MU IFNalpha alone thrice weekly for a further 40 weeks. Otherwise, treatment was discontinued. After the end of treatment, patients were followed up for 24 weeks.
Patient characteristics at baseline were not significantly different in the two treatment groups. An initial virological response at week 12 was seen in 61 (66%) patients receiving IFNalpha plus ribavirin and in 44 (48%) being treated with IFNalpha alone (p=0.015) and this improvement in the response rate was mainly restricted to HCV genotype 1-infected patients (58% vs. 38%). In contrast, end-of-treatment (week 52) and sustained virological response rates were similar in both groups (37% vs. 29% and 26% vs. 17% [p=0.1], respectively). Interestingly, patients with HCV genotype 3, however, clearly benefited from short-term combination therapy. Thus, sustained virological response rates in these patients significantly increased from 25% (IFNalpha monotherapy) to 59% (combination therapy) (p=0.05).
Short-term combined therapy for 12 weeks is more effective than the monotherapy with respect to the induction of an initial virological response but this effect applies only to genotype 1-infected patients. However, there is no significant difference between both therapeutic schedules with regard to the induction of sustained response. Although HCV genotype 3-infected patients seem to benefit from this short-term combined therapy, prolonged combined therapy may be necessary in HCV genotype 1-infected patients.
干扰素α(IFNα)联合利巴韦林治疗已被证明可提高慢性丙型肝炎患者的持续应答率,但关于该治疗方案的疗程信息较少。因此,在本研究中,我们试图评估不同病毒学参数的分析是否能为早期确定这种联合治疗形式的疗效提供新线索。此外,我们还研究了短期诱导联合治疗后仅用IFNα治疗是否比单一疗法在产生初始和持续病毒学应答方面更有效。
185例经组织学证实的慢性丙型肝炎患者(平均年龄42岁(范围19 - 65岁);男性110例,女性75例)纳入本研究。患者被随机分配,在最初12周内,接受干扰素α 2a 600万单位(MU)每周3次加利巴韦林14 mg/kg/天(n = 93)或相同剂量的单用IFNα(n = 92)。12周后出现病毒学应答(血清HCV RNA检测不到)的患者随后接受3 MU IFNα每周3次单独治疗40周。否则,停止治疗。治疗结束后,对患者随访24周。
两个治疗组的基线患者特征无显著差异。接受IFNα加利巴韦林治疗的61例(66%)患者和单用IFNα治疗的44例(48%)患者在第12周出现了初始病毒学应答(p = 0.015),应答率的这种提高主要限于HCV基因1型感染患者(58%对38%)。相比之下,两组的治疗结束时(第52周)和持续病毒学应答率相似(分别为37%对29%和26%对17% [p = 0.1])。然而,有趣的是,HCV基因3型患者明显从短期联合治疗中获益。因此,这些患者的持续病毒学应答率从25%(IFNα单一疗法)显著提高到59%(联合治疗)(p = 0.05)。
短期联合治疗12周在诱导初始病毒学应答方面比单一疗法更有效,但这种效果仅适用于基因1型感染患者。然而,在诱导持续应答方面,两种治疗方案之间没有显著差异。虽然HCV基因3型感染患者似乎从这种短期联合治疗中获益,但基因1型感染患者可能需要延长联合治疗。