Poynard T, Marcellin P, Lee S S, Niederau C, Minuk G S, Ideo G, Bain V, Heathcote J, Zeuzem S, Trepo C, Albrecht J
Groupe Hospitalier, Faculté Pitie-Salpêtrière, Université Paris VI, URA CNRS 1484, France.
Lancet. 1998 Oct 31;352(9138):1426-32. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)07124-4.
Only 15-20% of patients with chronic hepatitis C achieve a sustained virological response with interferon therapy. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of interferon alpha2b in combination with oral ribavirin with interferon alone, for treatment of chronic infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV).
832 patients aged 18 years or more with chronic HCV who had not been treated with interferon or ribavirin, were enrolled and randomly allocated one of three regimens: 3 mega units (MU) interferon alpha2b three times a week plus 1000-1200 mg ribavirin per day for 48 weeks; 3 MU interferon alpha2b three times a week plus 1000-1200 mg ribavirin per day for 24 weeks; or 3 MU interferon alpha2b three times a week and placebo for 48 weeks. All patients were assessed for safety, tolerance, and efficacy at the end of weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8, and every 4 weeks during treatment. After treatment was completed patients were followed up on weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24. The primary endpoint was loss of detectable HCV-RNA (serum HCV-RNA <100 copies/mL) at week 24 after treatment.
Sustained virological response at 24 weeks after treatment, was found in 119 (43%) of the 277 patients treated for 48 weeks with the combination regimen, 97 (35%) of the 277 patients treated for 24 weeks with the combination regimen (p=O.055), and 53 (19%) of the 278 patients treated for 48 weeks with interferon alone (p<0.001 vs both combination regimens, intention-to-treat analysis). Logistic regression identified five independent factors significantly associated with response: genotype 2 or 3, viral load less than 2 million copies/mL, age 40 years or less, minimal fibrosis stage, and female sex. Among patients with fewer than three of these factors the odds ratio of sustained response was 2.6 (95% Cl 1.4-4.8; p=0.002) for the 48 week combination regimen compared with 24 weeks of the combination regimen. Discontinuation of therapy for adverse events was more frequent with combination (19%) and monotherapy (13%) given for 48 weeks than combination therapy given for 24 weeks (8%).
An interferon alpha2b plus ribavirin combination is more effective than 48 weeks of interferon alpha2b monotherapy and has an acceptable safety profile. Patients with few favourable factors benefit more from extending the duration of combination therapy to 48 weeks.
在接受干扰素治疗的慢性丙型肝炎患者中,只有15% - 20%能实现持续病毒学应答。本研究旨在比较α2b干扰素联合口服利巴韦林与单用干扰素治疗丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)慢性感染的疗效和安全性。
纳入832例18岁及以上未接受过干扰素或利巴韦林治疗的慢性HCV患者,随机分配至三种治疗方案之一:300万单位(MU)α2b干扰素每周三次加1000 - 1200毫克利巴韦林每日一次,共48周;3MU α2b干扰素每周三次加1000 - 1200毫克利巴韦林每日一次,共24周;或3MU α2b干扰素每周三次加安慰剂,共48周。在第1、2、4、6和8周结束时以及治疗期间每4周对所有患者进行安全性、耐受性和疗效评估。治疗结束后,在第4、8、12和24周对患者进行随访。主要终点是治疗后第24周检测不到HCV - RNA(血清HCV - RNA<100拷贝/毫升)。
在接受48周联合治疗方案的277例患者中,119例(43%)在治疗后24周实现了持续病毒学应答;在接受24周联合治疗方案的277例患者中,97例(35%)实现了持续病毒学应答(p = 0.055);在接受48周单用干扰素治疗的278例患者中,53例(19%)实现了持续病毒学应答(意向性分析,与两种联合治疗方案相比p<0.001)。逻辑回归确定了与应答显著相关的五个独立因素:基因型2或3、病毒载量低于200万拷贝/毫升、年龄40岁及以下、最小纤维化阶段和女性。在这些因素少于三个的患者中,48周联合治疗方案的持续应答优势比为2.6(95%CI 1.4 - 4.8;p = 0.002),而24周联合治疗方案为2.6。因不良事件停药在48周联合治疗(19%)和48周单药治疗(13%)中比24周联合治疗(8%)更频繁。
α2b干扰素加利巴韦林联合治疗比48周α2b干扰素单药治疗更有效,且安全性可接受。有利因素少的患者从将联合治疗时间延长至48周中获益更多。