Wartenberg D
Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
Bioelectromagnetics. 2001;Suppl 5:S32-47. doi: 10.1002/1521-186x(2001)22:5+<::aid-bem1022>3.3.co;2-6.
Bias can have a major impact on the results of epidemiologic studies. In investigations of the possible association between residential exposure to magnetic fields and the occurrence of childhood leukemia, many have raised questions about selection bias, including participation bias and information bias. In this review, the data on these possible sources of bias are summarized and their likely impact is evaluated. Most data suggest that if a bias exists, it is a bias towards the lack of association between exposure to magnetic fields and childhood leukemia. In addition, given the wide variety of study populations and measurement protocols, it is unlikely that a single design flaw has resulted in consistent effects across all studies and can be the sole explanation for the reported associations.
偏倚可能对流行病学研究结果产生重大影响。在关于居住环境暴露于磁场与儿童白血病发生之间可能存在的关联的调查中,许多人对选择偏倚提出了疑问,包括参与偏倚和信息偏倚。在本综述中,总结了这些可能的偏倚来源的数据,并评估了它们可能产生的影响。大多数数据表明,如果存在偏倚,那么这种偏倚是倾向于暴露于磁场与儿童白血病之间缺乏关联的。此外,鉴于研究人群和测量方案的多样性,不太可能是单一的设计缺陷导致了所有研究中一致的效应,并且成为所报告关联的唯一解释。