Greenland Sander, Kheifets Leeka
Department of Epidemiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1772, USA.
Risk Anal. 2006 Apr;26(2):471-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00754.x.
Nearly every epidemiologic study of residential magnetic fields and childhood leukemia has exhibited a positive association. Nonetheless, because these studies suffer from various methodologic limitations and there is no known plausible mechanism of action, it remains uncertain as to how much, if any, of these associations are causal. Furthermore, because the observed associations are small and involve only the highest and most infrequent levels of exposure, it is believed that the public health impact of an effect would be small. We present some formal analyses of the impact of power-frequency residential magnetic-field exposure (as measured by attributable fractions), accounting for our uncertainties about study biases as well as uncertainties about exposure distribution. These analyses support the idea that the public health impact of residential fields is likely to be limited, but both no impact and a substantial impact remain possibilities in light of the available data.
几乎每一项关于居住环境磁场与儿童白血病的流行病学研究都显示出正相关关系。然而,由于这些研究存在各种方法学上的局限性,且尚无已知合理的作用机制,因此这些关联在多大程度上(如果有的话)是因果关系仍不确定。此外,由于观察到的关联较小,且仅涉及最高和最罕见的暴露水平,人们认为这种效应的公共卫生影响会很小。我们对工频居住磁场暴露的影响(以归因分数衡量)进行了一些形式分析,同时考虑到我们对研究偏差的不确定性以及暴露分布的不确定性。这些分析支持了居住磁场的公共卫生影响可能有限的观点,但根据现有数据,无影响和重大影响仍然都是有可能的。