Blockmans D, Knockaert D, Maes A, De Caestecker J, Stroobants S, Bobbaers H, Mortelmans L
Department of General Internal Medicine, Gasthuisberg University Hospital, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Jan 15;32(2):191-6. doi: 10.1086/318480.
We describe the diagnostic contribution of [(18)F]fluoro-deoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) scan in 58 consecutive cases of fever of unknown origin (FUO) and compare this new approach with gallium scintigraphy. This investigation was performed from March 1996 through October 1998 at Gasthuisberg University Hospital in Leuven, Belgium. A final diagnosis was established for 38 patients (64%). Forty-six FDG-PET scans (79%) were abnormal; 24 of these abnormal scans (41% of the total number of scans) were considered helpful in diagnosis, and 22 (38% of the total number) were considered noncontributory to the diagnosis. In a subgroup of 40 patients (69%), both FDG-PET and gallium scintigraphy were performed. FDG-PET scan and gallium scintigraphy were normal in 23% and 33% of these cases, respectively; helpful in diagnosis in 35% and 25%, respectively; and noncontributory in 42% each. All foci of abnormal gallium accumulation were also detected by use of an FDG-PET scan. We conclude that FDG-PET is a valuable second-step technique in patients with FUO because it yielded diagnostic information in 41% of the patients in whom the probability of a definite diagnosis was only 64%. FDG-PET scan compares favorably with gallium scintigraphy for this indication. Because of the quick results (within hours instead of days), FDG-PET scan may replace gallium scintigraphy as a radiopharmaceutical for the evaluation of patients with FUO.
我们描述了连续58例不明原因发热(FUO)患者中[(18)F]氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)正电子发射断层扫描(PET)的诊断作用,并将这种新方法与镓闪烁扫描进行比较。这项研究于1996年3月至1998年10月在比利时鲁汶的加斯豪斯贝格大学医院进行。38例患者(64%)确诊。46次FDG-PET扫描(79%)异常;其中24次异常扫描(占扫描总数的41%)被认为对诊断有帮助,22次(占总数的38%)被认为对诊断无贡献。在40例患者(69%)的亚组中,同时进行了FDG-PET和镓闪烁扫描。在这些病例中,FDG-PET扫描和镓闪烁扫描分别有23%和33%正常;分别有35%和25%对诊断有帮助;分别有42%对诊断无贡献。所有镓异常聚集灶也通过FDG-PET扫描检测到。我们得出结论,FDG-PET是FUO患者有价值的第二步检查技术,因为在确诊概率仅为64%的患者中,它为41%的患者提供了诊断信息。对于该适应证,FDG-PET扫描与镓闪烁扫描相比具有优势。由于结果快速(数小时内而非数天),FDG-PET扫描可能会取代镓闪烁扫描作为评估FUO患者的放射性药物。