Litvan H, Jensen E W, Maestre M L, Galán J, Campos J M, Fernández J A, Caminal P, Villar Landeira J M
Servicio de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapia del Dolor, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2000 Dec;47(10):447-57.
To evaluate an anesthetic depth index (ADI) obtained from auditory evoked potentials and a bispectral EEG index (BIS) in comparison with clinical assessment of anesthetic depth using the modified observer's assessment of awareness/sedation scale (MOAA/SS), for induction of anesthesia with propofol or sevoflurane as the only agent.
The ADI and BIS were recorded simultaneously in this prospective study and compared to the MOAA/SS during the anesthetic induction of 26 adults undergoing elective heart surgery. Assignment of patients to two groups was random. Group A (n = 13) patients were induced with propofol (target dose 5 micrograms.ml-1 in 5 min). Induction in group B (n = 13) was with sevoflurane (8% tidal volume). A scheme of awake-sleeping-awake-sleeping was followed. The means of the two indexes were compared (Mann-Whitney test) one minute before the patient slept (awake) and one minute later (sleeping), and the evolution of the indexes was compared during awake/sleep and sleep/awake phase changes and while the patients were in a stable sleep phase. The sensitivity and specificity of each index was analyzed in function of the MOAA/SS. We also analyzed the time elapsing from the moment the patient fell asleep (MOAA/SS 2) until the two indexes reached published reference values (ADI = 38, BIS = 60).
After induction with propofol (group A) the ADI fell to 29.2 +/- 11.7 and the BIS fell to 63.5 +/- 13.4. After induction with sevoflurane (group B) the ADI fell to 33.8 +/- 14.9 and the BIS to 66.8 +/- 15. The ADI value that best discriminated between arousal and sleeping (sensitivity 100%) was 38; the BIS value that best discriminated was 60. The responses to sound in decibels (dB) during "awake/sleeping" and "sleeping/awake" phases were, respectively, -3.8 dB and -4.5 dB for the ADI and -1.5 dB and -0.8 dB for the BIS. With the patient in stable sleep, response to the two indexes was at -0.79 dB. In group A, the ADI detected MOAA/SS 2 significantly earlier (ADI 13.1 +/- 30 s; BIS 56 +/- 36 s; p < 0.05). No patient reported remembering the study period.
Monitoring anesthetic depth with the ADI or BIS was technically easy and effective for detecting whether patients were awake or sleeping. The ADI response was faster and identified awake/sleeping and sleeping/awake phase changes better than did the BIS.
评估通过听觉诱发电位获得的麻醉深度指数(ADI)和脑电双频指数(BIS),并与使用改良的观察者警觉/镇静评分量表(MOAA/SS)对麻醉深度进行的临床评估相比较,以丙泊酚或七氟醚作为唯一麻醉诱导药物。
在这项前瞻性研究中,同时记录26例接受择期心脏手术的成年患者麻醉诱导期间的ADI和BIS,并与MOAA/SS进行比较。患者随机分为两组。A组(n = 13)患者采用丙泊酚诱导(目标剂量5微克·毫升⁻¹,5分钟内给予)。B组(n = 13)采用七氟醚诱导(潮气量8%)。采用清醒-睡眠-清醒-睡眠模式。比较患者入睡(清醒)前1分钟和1分钟后(睡眠)这两个指数的均值(Mann-Whitney检验),并比较清醒/睡眠和睡眠/清醒阶段变化期间以及患者处于稳定睡眠阶段时指数的变化情况。根据MOAA/SS分析每个指数的敏感性和特异性。我们还分析了从患者入睡(MOAA/SS 2)到两个指数达到已发表的参考值(ADI = 38,BIS = 60)所经过的时间。
丙泊酚诱导后(A组),ADI降至29.2±11.7,BIS降至63.5±13.4。七氟醚诱导后(B组),ADI降至33.8±14.9,BIS降至66.8±15。能最佳区分觉醒和睡眠的ADI值为38(敏感性100%);能最佳区分的BIS值为60。在“清醒/睡眠”和“睡眠/清醒”阶段,对声音的分贝(dB)反应,ADI分别为-3.8 dB和-4.5 dB,BIS分别为-1.5 dB和-0.8 dB。患者处于稳定睡眠状态时,对这两个指数的反应为-0.79 dB。在A组中,ADI显著更早检测到MOAA/SS 2(ADI为13.1±30秒;BIS为56±36秒;p < 0.05)。没有患者报告记得研究期间的情况。
使用ADI或BIS监测麻醉深度在技术上简单有效,可用于检测患者是清醒还是睡眠状态。ADI的反应更快,比BIS能更好地识别清醒/睡眠和睡眠/清醒阶段的变化。