Horn Bettina, Pilge Stefanie, Kochs Eberhard F, Stockmanns Gudrun, Hock Andreas, Schneider Gerhard
Department of Anesthesiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Anesth Analg. 2009 May;108(5):1512-21. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a04d4c.
It has been shown that the combination of electroencephalogram (EEG) and auditory evoked potentials (AEP) allows a good separation of consciousness from unconsciousness. In the present study, we sought a combined EEG/AEP indicator that allows both separation of consciousness from unconsciousness and discrimination among different levels of sedation and hypnosis over a wider range of anesthesia.
Fifteen unpremedicated volunteers received mono-anesthesia with sevoflurane or propofol in a randomized crossover design in two consecutive sessions. Loss of consciousness (LOC) and EEG burst suppression (BSP) defined end-points from the upper and lower range of general anesthesia. In addition to those two extremes, the difference between anesthetic concentration at BSP and LOC was divided into three equal intervals, resulting in two intermediate levels which divided the concentration from LOC (minimum) to BSP (maximum) into three equal steps. This data set was used to test whether a previously described combined EEG/AEP indicator "detector of consciousness" can also discriminate among degrees of anesthetic effects from the awake state to BSP. Furthermore, a new improved combined EEG/AEP indicator was developed on the basis of the data from the current study, and subsequently this new indicator was tested for its ability to separate consciousness from unconsciousness with the patient data set.
The former "detector of consciousness" showed a prediction probability (P(K)) of 0.77 to separate different levels of anesthesia from the current study, whereas for the new combined EEG/AEP indicator, P(K) was 0.94. The new indicator was further applied to the previous study and achieved a P(K) of 0.89.
These results show that with the new indicator presented here, a combination of EEG and AEP parameters can be used to differentiate degrees of anesthetic effects over a wide range of hypnosis, from the conscious state to deep anesthesia (i.e., BSP).
研究表明,脑电图(EEG)和听觉诱发电位(AEP)相结合能够很好地区分意识与无意识状态。在本研究中,我们寻求一种EEG/AEP联合指标,该指标既能区分意识与无意识状态,又能在更广泛的麻醉范围内区分不同程度的镇静和催眠状态。
15名未使用术前药的志愿者在两个连续的时段内接受了七氟醚或丙泊酚的单药麻醉,采用随机交叉设计。意识消失(LOC)和脑电图爆发抑制(BSP)分别定义了全身麻醉上下限的终点。除了这两个极端情况外,BSP和LOC时麻醉浓度的差值被等分为三个区间,从而产生了两个中间水平,将从LOC(最低)到BSP(最高)的浓度分为三个相等的步骤。该数据集用于测试先前描述的联合EEG/AEP指标“意识探测器”是否也能区分从清醒状态到BSP的不同麻醉效果程度。此外,基于本研究的数据开发了一种新的改进型联合EEG/AEP指标,随后用患者数据集测试该新指标区分意识与无意识状态的能力。
先前的“意识探测器”对本研究中不同麻醉水平的预测概率(P(K))为0.77,而新的联合EEG/AEP指标的P(K)为0.94。新指标进一步应用于先前的研究,P(K)为0.89。
这些结果表明,使用本文提出的新指标,EEG和AEP参数的组合可用于区分从清醒状态到深度麻醉(即BSP)的广泛催眠范围内的不同麻醉效果程度。