Suppr超能文献

教学医院与非教学医院的社区获得性菌血症:疾病急性严重程度对30天死亡率的影响。

Community-acquired bacteremia at a teaching versus a nonteaching hospital: impact of acute severity of illness on 30-day mortality.

作者信息

Mylotte J M, Kahler L, McCann C

机构信息

Departments of Medicine and Microbiology, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York, and the Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Erie County Medical Center, USA.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 2001 Feb;29(1):13-9. doi: 10.1067/mic.2001.110567.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few studies have focused recently on the epidemiology of community-acquired bacteremia (CAB) and there have been few comparisons of CAB in teaching versus nonteaching hospitals.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the clinical characteristics, acute severity of illness, and 30-day mortality of patients with CAB admitted to a teaching and a nonteaching hospital and to define predictors of 30-day mortality among patients with CAB that would be identifiable at the time of admission to the hospital.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of CAB at a teaching hospital (n = 174 episodes) compared to a community nonteaching hospital (n = 74 episodes) during 1995. Data collected included demographic characteristics, underlying diseases, sources of CAB, and antimicrobial therapy. Acute severity of illness on admission was measured by using the acute physiology score component of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III system (APS APACHE III).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Status, dead or alive, 30 days after admission for CAB.

RESULTS

At the nonteaching hospital, patients were older but, on average, significantly less acutely ill (as measured by the admission APS APACHE III score) than were those at the teaching hospital. In contrast, patients with HIV infection, posttransplantation, or on hemodialysis were identified only at the teaching hospital. Overall, organisms causing CAB at both hospitals were similar except that Staphylococcus aureus CAB occurred significantly more often at the teaching hospital and Escherichia coli CAB occurred more often at the nonteaching hospital. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality in patients with CAB between the teaching hospital (19.3%) and the nonteaching hospital (16.7%; P =.63). APS APACHE III score on admission identified episodes of CAB with a low- and a high-risk for 30-day mortality at both hospitals. Independent predictors of 30-day mortality were APACHE III score on admission (P <.001) and pneumonia as a source of CAB (P =.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with CAB, acute severity of illness on admission was the most important predictor of 30-day mortality at both hospitals. Even though patients with CAB were, on average, more severely ill at the time of admission to the teaching hospital, 30-day mortality rates were not significantly different between the two hospitals because deaths correlated with high APS APACHE III scores at both facilities. The APS APACHE III score on admission provides important prognostic information among patients with CAB.

摘要

背景

近期很少有研究聚焦于社区获得性菌血症(CAB)的流行病学,而且教学医院与非教学医院的CAB对比研究也很少。

目的

比较教学医院和非教学医院收治的CAB患者的临床特征、疾病急性严重程度及30天死亡率,并确定在入院时可识别的CAB患者30天死亡率的预测因素。

方法

这是一项对1995年一家教学医院(174例)和一家社区非教学医院(74例)的CAB进行的回顾性研究。收集的数据包括人口统计学特征、基础疾病、CAB的来源及抗菌治疗。入院时的疾病急性严重程度采用急性生理学与慢性健康状况评价III系统(APS APACHE III)的急性生理学评分部分进行测量。

主要观察指标

CAB入院30天后的生存状态,即死亡或存活。

结果

在非教学医院,患者年龄较大,但平均而言,病情的急性严重程度(通过入院时的APS APACHE III评分衡量)明显低于教学医院的患者。相比之下,HIV感染、移植后或接受血液透析的患者仅在教学医院被发现。总体而言,两家医院引起CAB的病原体相似,只是金黄色葡萄球菌CAB在教学医院的发生率明显更高,而大肠杆菌CAB在非教学医院的发生率更高。教学医院(19.3%)和非教学医院(16.7%;P = 0.63)CAB患者的30天死亡率无显著差异。入院时的APS APACHE III评分可识别两家医院30天死亡率低风险和高风险的CAB病例。30天死亡率的独立预测因素为入院时的APACHE III评分(P < 0.001)和肺炎作为CAB的来源(P = 0.012)。

结论

在CAB患者中,入院时的疾病急性严重程度是两家医院30天死亡率的最重要预测因素。尽管CAB患者入院时平均病情更严重,但两家医院的30天死亡率并无显著差异,因为死亡与两家机构的高APS APACHE III评分相关。入院时的APS APACHE III评分为CAB患者提供了重要的预后信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验