Schriger D L, Gibbons P S, Langone C A, Lee S, Altshuler L L
University of California-Los Angeles Emergency Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry, and School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Feb;37(2):132-40. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.112255.
Undiagnosed mental illness is highly prevalent and produces needless morbidity. Emergency department patients with vague or longstanding complaints are at risk for occult mental illness, but are seldom diagnosed. We conducted this study to determine whether a previously validated, self-administered, computerized psychiatric interview (Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders [PRIME-MD]) could increase the detection of occult psychiatric illness in the ED.
This was a randomized, controlled trial of consecutive patients enrolled during convenient times at a university teaching hospital ED with an annual census of 38,000. ED house staff and attending physicians participated. Patients were those with nonspecific complaints potentially associated with occult psychiatric illness (eg, long-standing headache, abdominal or back pain). Exclusion criteria were known psychiatric illness, complaint, or medication; and straightforward reason for the ED visit. Consenting subjects completed the PRIME-MD questionnaire in the waiting room, and were randomly assigned to either the "report" (report results given to physician) or "no-report" groups. PRIME-MD results were clipped to the front of the chart of report group patients. There was no other intervention. The main outcome measures were the percentage of all patients and percentage of patients with a PRIME-MD diagnosis who received a psychiatric diagnosis, consultation, or referral from the emergency physician.
A total of 339 (5.1%) of all patients were approached; 230 consented to participate in the study, and 218 completed the PRIME-MD session and were randomly assigned to study groups. Ninety-two patients in the report group and 98 cases in the no-report group were analyzed. Patients were omitted for the following reasons: left without being seen (8), mistakenly enrolled (10), or unretrievable medical records (10). Seventy-nine (42%) patients received a psychiatric diagnosis from PRIME-MD and 9 (5%) from the physician. The frequencies of physician psychiatric diagnosis and referral did not differ between groups (diagnosis: report 9%, no report 9%, Delta 0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -13, 14; referral: report 9%, no report 7%, Delta 2%, 95% CI -11, 16).
ED patients willingly completed the PRIME-MD questionnaire (in a median time of 7 minutes), which frequently diagnosed psychiatric conditions. Despite this, physicians rarely diagnosed or treated these conditions regardless of whether they were provided with the PRIME-MD diagnoses.
未确诊的精神疾病极为普遍,并导致不必要的发病情况。急诊科中存在模糊或长期诉求的患者有隐匿性精神疾病的风险,但很少被诊断出来。我们开展这项研究以确定一种先前经验证的、可自行操作的计算机化精神科访谈(精神障碍初级保健评估[PRIME - MD])能否提高急诊科对隐匿性精神疾病的检出率。
这是一项随机对照试验,研究对象为在一所年接诊量达38000人次的大学教学医院急诊科于便利时段连续纳入的患者。急诊科住院医师和主治医生参与其中。患者为有与隐匿性精神疾病潜在相关的非特异性诉求者(如长期头痛、腹痛或背痛)。排除标准为已知的精神疾病、诉求或用药情况;以及到急诊科就诊的明确原因。同意参与的受试者在候诊室完成PRIME - MD问卷,并被随机分配至“报告”组(将结果报告给医生)或“不报告”组。PRIME - MD结果被附在报告组患者病历的首页。未进行其他干预。主要结局指标为所有患者中以及PRIME - MD诊断为精神疾病的患者中接受急诊科医生精神科诊断、会诊或转诊的患者百分比。
共接触了339名(5.1%)患者;230名同意参与研究,218名完成了PRIME - MD访谈并被随机分配至研究组。对报告组的92名患者和不报告组的98名患者进行了分析。因以下原因排除了部分患者:未就诊离开(8例)、误纳入(10例)或无法获取病历(10例)。79名(42%)患者经PRIME - MD诊断为精神疾病,9名(5%)经医生诊断为精神疾病。两组间医生精神科诊断和转诊的频率无差异(诊断:报告组9%,不报告组9%,差值0%,95%置信区间[CI] - 13, 14;转诊:报告组9%,不报告组7%,差值2%,95% CI - 11, 16)。
急诊科患者愿意完成PRIME - MD问卷(中位时间为7分钟),该问卷频繁诊断出精神状况。尽管如此,无论是否向医生提供PRIME - MD诊断结果,医生很少对这些状况进行诊断或治疗。