School of Psychology, College of Education and Behavioral Studies, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Department of Psychiatry, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 24;12(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02177-6.
Several studies have been conducted on the effect of interventions on the detection of depression in primary healthcare (PHC). Systematic reviews have also been done on the effectiveness of separate interventions. However, systematic reviews are not done on the comparative effectiveness of several interventions. This study, therefore, aimed at synthesizing the global evidence on the effectiveness of interventions to improve the detection of depression in PHC.
We searched PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Global Index Medicus, African Index Medicus, and African Journals Online, from the inception of the databases to until the 4th week of April 2020. We also searched references of the included articles. We included randomized trials, cluster randomized trials, or quasi-experimental studies, which evaluated the effectiveness of an intervention to improve detection of depression in the PHC setting. Two of the review authors independently extracted data from the included studies. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies developed by the Effective Public Health Practice Project. The protocol for the review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020166291).
Of 23,305 records identified, we included 58 articles in the review. Diverse types of interventions were evaluated to improve clinician diagnosis of depression in the PHC setting. Interventions related to implementation of guidelines, screening with feedback, educational interventions which incorporated active learning and clinical practice, and disclosure of screening results were found to be mostly effective. Interventions which combined education, screening, and feedback were particularly more effective. Most of the included studies were weak or moderate in their methodological quality.
Our review indicates that implementation of a single type of intervention does not improve the detection of depression in PHC. Combining aspects of each type of intervention which are more effective may be useful. Education and training interventions which include more simulation and role playing are found to be effective over time. Most of the studies conducted in the area are from high-income countries and are weak in their methodological quality. There is need to conduct more number of studies in low-income settings.
已有多项研究针对干预措施对初级医疗保健(PHC)中抑郁检出率的影响进行了探讨。也有单独干预措施效果的系统评价。但是,尚未对多种干预措施的相对有效性进行系统评价。因此,本研究旨在综合全球证据,评估干预措施改善 PHC 中抑郁检出率的效果。
我们检索了 PubMed、Embase、PsycINFO、Web of Science、Cochrane 系统评价数据库、全球医学索引、非洲医学索引和非洲期刊在线,检索时间从数据库建立到 2020 年 4 月第 4 周。我们还检索了纳入文章的参考文献。纳入评估干预措施改善 PHC 环境中抑郁检出率效果的随机试验、整群随机试验或准实验研究。两位综述作者独立提取纳入研究的数据。采用有效公共卫生实践项目制定的定量研究评估工具评估纳入研究的方法学质量。本研究已在 PROSPERO(CRD42020166291)上注册。
在 23305 条记录中,我们纳入了 58 篇文章进行综述。为改善 PHC 环境中临床医生对抑郁的诊断,评估了多种类型的干预措施。与实施指南、有反馈的筛查、包含主动学习和临床实践的教育干预以及筛查结果的披露相关的干预措施效果较好。将教育、筛查和反馈相结合的干预措施效果更为显著。纳入的大多数研究方法学质量较弱或为中等。
本综述表明,单一类型的干预措施并不能提高 PHC 中的抑郁检出率。结合每种类型干预措施中更有效的方面可能有用。随着时间的推移,发现包含更多模拟和角色扮演的教育和培训干预措施较为有效。该领域的大多数研究来自高收入国家,方法学质量较弱。有必要在低收入环境中开展更多的研究。