Suppr超能文献

血糖控制改善对医疗保健成本和利用的影响。

Effect of improved glycemic control on health care costs and utilization.

作者信息

Wagner E H, Sandhu N, Newton K M, McCulloch D K, Ramsey S D, Grothaus L C

机构信息

MacColl Institute for Healthcare Innovation, Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative, 1730 Minor Ave, Suite 1290, Seattle, WA 98101, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 2001 Jan 10;285(2):182-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.2.182.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Because of the additional costs associated with improving diabetes management, there is interest in whether improved glycemic control leads to reductions in health care costs, and, if so, when such cost savings occur.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether sustained improvements in hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) levels among diabetic patients are followed by reductions in health care utilization and costs.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Historical cohort study conducted in 1992-1997 in a staff-model health maintenance organization (HMO) in western Washington State.

PARTICIPANTS

All diabetic patients aged 18 years or older who were continuously enrolled between January 1992 and March 1996 and had HbA(1c) measured at least once per year in 1992-1994 (n = 4744). Patients whose HbA(1c) decreased 1% or more between 1992 and 1993 and sustained the decline through 1994 were considered to be improved (n = 732). All others were classified as unimproved (n = 4012).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Total health care costs, percentage hospitalized, and number of primary care and specialty visits among the improved vs unimproved cohorts in 1992-1997.

RESULTS

Diabetic patients whose HbA(1c) measurements improved were similar demographically to those whose levels did not improve but had higher baseline HbA(1c) measurements (10.0% vs 7.7%; P<.001). Mean total health care costs were $685 to $950 less each year in the improved cohort for 1994 (P =.09), 1995 (P =.003), 1996 (P =.002), and 1997 (P =.01). Cost savings in the improved cohort were statistically significant only among those with the highest baseline HbA(1c) levels (>/=10%) for these years but appeared to be unaffected by presence of complications at baseline. Beginning in the year following improvement (1994), utilization was consistently lower in the improved cohort, reaching statistical significance for primary care visits in 1994 (P =.001), 1995 (P<.001), 1996 (P =.005), and 1997 (P =.004) and for specialty visits in 1997 (P =.02). Differences in hospitalization rates were not statistically significant in any year.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that a sustained reduction in HbA(1c) level among adult diabetic patients is associated with significant cost savings within 1 to 2 years of improvement.

摘要

背景

由于改善糖尿病管理会产生额外费用,因此人们关注改善血糖控制是否能降低医疗保健成本,以及如果能降低,这种成本节省何时会出现。

目的

确定糖尿病患者血红蛋白A(1c)(HbA(1c))水平持续改善后,医疗保健利用率和成本是否会降低。

设计与地点

1992 - 1997年在华盛顿州西部一家员工模式的健康维护组织(HMO)中进行的历史性队列研究。

参与者

所有年龄在18岁及以上的糖尿病患者,他们在1992年1月至1996年3月期间持续参保,并且在1992 - 1994年每年至少测量一次HbA(1c)(n = 4744)。HbA(1c)在1992年至1993年期间下降1%或更多且在1994年持续下降的患者被认为是改善组(n = 732)。所有其他患者被归类为未改善组(n = 4012)。

主要结局指标

1992 - 1997年改善组与未改善组之间的总医疗保健成本、住院百分比以及初级保健和专科就诊次数。

结果

HbA(1c)测量值改善的糖尿病患者在人口统计学特征上与未改善的患者相似,但基线HbA(1c)测量值更高(10.0%对7.7%;P <.001)。1994年(P =.09)、1995年(P =.003)、1996年(P =.002)和1997年(P =.01),改善组每年的平均总医疗保健成本少685至950美元。在这些年份中,改善组的成本节省仅在基线HbA(1c)水平最高(≥10%)的患者中具有统计学意义,但似乎不受基线并发症的影响。从改善后的次年(1994年)开始,改善组的利用率持续较低,1994年初级保健就诊次数达到统计学意义(P =.001),1995年(P <.001),1996年(P =.005)和1997年(P =.004),1997年专科就诊次数达到统计学意义(P =.02)。住院率在任何一年的差异均无统计学意义。

结论

我们的数据表明,成年糖尿病患者HbA(1c)水平的持续降低与改善后1至2年内的显著成本节省相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验