Suppr超能文献

床边D - 二聚体检测和肺泡死腔测量用于快速排除肺栓塞的诊断准确性:一项多中心研究。

Diagnostic accuracy of a bedside D-dimer assay and alveolar dead-space measurement for rapid exclusion of pulmonary embolism: a multicenter study.

作者信息

Kline J A, Israel E G, Michelson E A, O'Neil B J, Plewa M C, Portelli D C

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC 28232-2816, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 2001 Feb 14;285(6):761-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.6.761.

Abstract

CONTEXT

A previous study suggested that the combination of a normal D-dimer assay and normal alveolar dead-space fraction is a highly sensitive screening test for pulmonary embolism (PE).

OBJECTIVE

To determine if the combination of a normal alveolar dead-space fraction (volume of alveolar dead space/tidal volume </=20%) and a normal whole-blood agglutination D-dimer assay can exclude PE in emergency department (ED) patients.

DESIGN

Prospective, noninterventional study conducted in 1998-1999. Study data were obtained prior to standard testing for PE, consisting of radionuclide lung scanning or contrast-enhanced computed tomography and 6-month follow-up plus selective use of venous ultrasonography and pulmonary angiography. Imaging studies were interpreted by blinded observers.

SETTING

Six urban teaching hospitals in the United States.

PATIENTS

A total of 380 hemodynamically stable ED patients aged 18 years or older with suspected acute PE.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Sensitivity and specificity for PE with a positive test defined as having either alveolar dead-space fraction or D-dimer assay results abnormal. Alveolar dead-space fraction was determined by subtracting airway dead space from physiological dead space (determined using the modified Bohr equation) and D-dimer assay, assayed at bedside using 20 microL of arterial blood.

RESULTS

Pulmonary embolism was diagnosed in 64 patients (16.8%), of those 20 had an abnormal D-dimer assay result, 3 had an abnormal alveolar dead-space fraction, 40 had abnormal results in both, and 1 had normal results for both tests. The sensitivity for diagnosis of PE was 98.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 91.6%-100.0%). Among the 316 patients without PE, both D-dimer and dead-space results were normal in 163, for a specificity of 51.6% (95% CI, 46.1%-57.1%). Posterior probability of PE with normal results on both tests was 0.75% (95% CI, 0%-3.4%).

CONCLUSION

In this multicenter study of ED patients, a normal D-dimer assay result plus a normal alveolar dead-space fraction was associated with a low prevalence of PE.

摘要

背景

先前的一项研究表明,正常的D - 二聚体检测与正常的肺泡死腔分数相结合是一种对肺栓塞(PE)高度敏感的筛查试验。

目的

确定正常的肺泡死腔分数(肺泡死腔容积/潮气量≤20%)与正常的全血凝集D - 二聚体检测相结合能否排除急诊科(ED)患者的PE。

设计

1998 - 1999年进行的前瞻性、非干预性研究。研究数据在PE的标准检测之前获得,标准检测包括放射性核素肺扫描或增强CT,以及6个月的随访,外加选择性使用静脉超声和肺血管造影。影像学研究由不知情的观察者解读。

地点

美国的6家城市教学医院。

患者

共有380例年龄在18岁及以上、血流动力学稳定、疑似急性PE的ED患者。

主要观察指标

以肺泡死腔分数或D - 二聚体检测结果异常定义为阳性检测时,对PE的敏感性和特异性。肺泡死腔分数通过从生理死腔(使用改良的玻尔方程确定)中减去气道死腔来确定,D - 二聚体检测在床边使用20微升动脉血进行检测。

结果

64例患者(16.8%)被诊断为肺栓塞,其中20例D - 二聚体检测结果异常,3例肺泡死腔分数异常,40例两者结果均异常,1例两项检测结果均正常。诊断PE的敏感性为98.4%(95%置信区间[CI],91.6% - 100.0%)。在316例无PE的患者中,163例D - 二聚体和死腔结果均正常,特异性为51.6%(95% CI,46.1% - 57.1%)。两项检测结果均正常时PE的后验概率为0.75%(95% CI,0% - 3.4%)。

结论

在这项针对ED患者的多中心研究中,正常的D - 二聚体检测结果加上正常的肺泡死腔分数与PE的低患病率相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验