Wicklund Matthew P., Kissel John T.
Department of Neurology, Division of Neuromuscular Disease, The Ohio State University, 1654 Upham Drive, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2001 Mar;3(2):147-156. doi: 10.1007/s11940-001-0050-5.
Few prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trials have been performed to guide clinicians in the management of neuropathies seen in the setting of monoclonal gammopathies (paraproteins). Recommendations must be made on the basis of clinical experience and information gleaned from various uncontrolled and open-label trials. In every instance, decisions concerning therapy must be based on the clinical setting in which the paraprotein occurs. Treatment of paraproteinemic neuropathies associated with multiple myeloma, amyloidosis, and Waldenström's macroglobulinemia should be directed at the treatment of the underlying disease. These neuropathies often remain recalcitrant to therapy. If the paraprotein results from cryoglobulinemia due to hepatitis C virus infection, interferon-alpha (with or without ribavirin) provides optimal subjective and objective relief from symptoms. For neuropathy associated with osteosclerotic myeloma (POEMS syndrome) and solitary bone lesions, radiation therapy is the most effective and least toxic initial therapy. In those patients with monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance (MGUS), consideration of the clinical syndrome may be very helpful in selecting appropriate treatment. Patients who fulfill diagnostic criteria for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) are best treated in a manner similar to that used for idiopathic CIDP (ie, with intravenous immunoglobulin, plasma exchange, and corticosteroids). Class I evidence documents plasma exchange to be effective in peripheral neuropathies associated with MGUS of the IgG and IgA, but not IgM, types. The most difficult cases to treat are those with peripheral neuropathies associated with IgM monoclonal gammopathies, with or without reactivity to myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG). A number of published case series propose therapeutic regimens for these conditions, yet optimal treatment remains to be established. In many cases, mildly symptomatic patients should not be subjected to the morbidity associated with current treatment regimens. In those patients requiring treatment, this author initially tries plasma exchange, followed by a course of chlorambucil if the symptoms and signs are predominantly sensory. For cases with rapid progression or significant disability, a regimen of monthly pulses with prednisone and cyclophosphamide is recommended. If improvement does not ensue, a trial of a newer agent, such as rituximab, is recommended. Supportive treatment with physical therapy, orthotics, and ambulatory aids enhances patient independence at a relatively low cost.
很少有前瞻性、随机、安慰剂对照试验来指导临床医生处理单克隆丙种球蛋白病(副蛋白)相关的神经病变。必须根据临床经验以及从各种非对照和开放标签试验中收集的信息来提出建议。在每种情况下,有关治疗的决策都必须基于副蛋白出现的临床背景。与多发性骨髓瘤、淀粉样变性和华氏巨球蛋白血症相关的副蛋白血症性神经病变的治疗应针对基础疾病。这些神经病变往往对治疗反应不佳。如果副蛋白是由丙型肝炎病毒感染引起的冷球蛋白血症所致,α干扰素(联合或不联合利巴韦林)能使症状在主观和客观上得到最佳缓解。对于与骨硬化性骨髓瘤(POEMS综合征)和孤立性骨病变相关的神经病变,放射治疗是最有效且毒性最小的初始治疗方法。对于意义未明的单克隆丙种球蛋白病(MGUS)患者,考虑临床综合征可能对选择合适的治疗非常有帮助。符合慢性炎症性脱髓鞘性多发性神经根神经病(CIDP)诊断标准的患者,最佳治疗方式与特发性CIDP相似(即使用静脉注射免疫球蛋白、血浆置换和皮质类固醇)。I类证据表明血浆置换对与IgG和IgA类型而非IgM类型的MGUS相关的周围神经病变有效。最难治疗的病例是那些与IgM单克隆丙种球蛋白病相关的周围神经病变,无论是否对髓鞘相关糖蛋白(MAG)有反应。一些已发表的病例系列提出了针对这些情况的治疗方案,但最佳治疗方法仍有待确定。在许多情况下,症状轻微的患者不应承受当前治疗方案带来的不良影响。对于那些需要治疗的患者,作者最初尝试血浆置换,如果症状和体征以感觉为主,则随后给予苯丁酸氮芥疗程。对于进展迅速或有严重残疾的病例,建议采用每月一次泼尼松和环磷酰胺冲击治疗方案。如果没有改善,建议试用一种新型药物,如利妥昔单抗。物理治疗、矫形器和助行器的支持性治疗以相对较低的成本提高了患者的独立性。