Firsov A A, Lubenko I Y, Portnoy Y A, Zinner S H, Vostrov S N
Department of Pharmacokinetics, Centre of Science & Technology LekBioTech, Moscow, Russia.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001 Mar;45(3):927-31. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.3.927-931.2001.
Most integral endpoints of the antimicrobial effect are determined over an arbitrarily chosen time period, such as the dosing interval (tau), regardless of the actual effect duration. Unlike the tau-related endpoints, the intensity of the antimicrobial effect (I(E)) does consider its duration-from time zero to the time when bacterial counts on the regrowth curve achieve the same maximal numbers as in the absence of the antimicrobial. To examine the possible impact of this fundamental difference on the relationships of the antimicrobial effect to the ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) to the MIC, a clinical isolate of Staphylococcus aureus was exposed to simulated gemifloxacin pharmacokinetics over a 40-fold range of AUC/MIC ratios, from 11 to 466 h. In each run, I(E) and four tau-related endpoints, including the area under the time-kill curve (AUBC), the area above the curve (AAC), the area between the control growth and time-kill curves (ABBC), and the ABBC related to the area under the control growth curve (AUGC), were calculated for tau = 24 h. Unlike the I(E), which displayed pseudolinear relationships with the AUC/MIC ratio; each tau-related endpoint showed a distinct saturation at potentially therapeutic AUC/MIC ratios (116 to 466 h) when the antimicrobial effect persisted longer than tau. This saturation results from the underestimation of the true effect and may be eliminated if ABBC, AAC, and AUBC (but not AUGC) are modified and determined in the same manner as the I(E) to consider the actual effect duration. These data suggest a marginal value of the tau-related endpoints as indices of the total antimicrobial effect. Since all of them respond to AUC/MIC ratio changes less than the I(E), the latter is preferable in comparative pharmacodynamic studies.
大多数抗菌效果的整体终点是在任意选定的时间段内确定的,例如给药间隔(τ),而不考虑实际的效应持续时间。与τ相关的终点不同,抗菌效果强度(I(E))确实考虑了其持续时间——从时间零点到再生长曲线上细菌计数达到与无抗菌药物时相同的最大数量的时间。为了研究这种根本差异对抗菌效果与浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)与最低抑菌浓度(MIC)之比之间关系的可能影响,将金黄色葡萄球菌的临床分离株暴露于模拟的吉米沙星药代动力学中,AUC/MIC比范围为40倍,从11至466小时。在每次实验中,对于τ = 24小时,计算I(E)和四个与τ相关的终点,包括杀菌曲线下面积(AUBC)、曲线以上面积(AAC)、对照生长曲线与杀菌曲线之间的面积(ABBC)以及与对照生长曲线下面积(AUGC)相关的ABBC。与显示与AUC/MIC比呈假线性关系的I(E)不同;当抗菌效果持续时间长于τ时,每个与τ相关的终点在潜在治疗性AUC/MIC比(116至466小时)时均表现出明显的饱和。这种饱和是由于对真实效果的低估导致的,如果按照与I(E)相同的方式修改并确定ABBC、AAC和AUBC(但不是AUGC)以考虑实际效应持续时间,则可能消除这种饱和。这些数据表明与τ相关的终点作为总抗菌效果指标的价值有限。由于它们对AUC/MIC比变化的反应均小于I(E),因此在比较药效学研究中,后者更可取。