Suppr超能文献

用铊-201门控单光子发射计算机断层扫描评估心肌梗死患者的射血分数:静息-再分布研究中的精密度以及与平面血管造影相比的准确性。

Assessment of ejection fraction with Tl-201 gated SPECT in myocardial infarction: Precision in a rest-redistribution study and accuracy versus planar angiography.

作者信息

Itti E, Rosso J, Damien P, Auffret M, Thirion J P, Meignan M

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Henri Mondor Hospital/Paris XII University, 51 av du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France.

出版信息

J Nucl Cardiol. 2001 Jan-Feb;8(1):31-9. doi: 10.1067/mnc.2001.109863.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Viability and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) are essential measures for the assessment of myocardial infarction (MI). These 2 variables may be evaluated simultaneously by means of thallium-201 gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT); however, the precision and accuracy of LVEF measurements with this isotope remain controversial, particularly in cases of extended perfusion defects and poor count densities.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fifty patients with a history of MI underwent a 20-minute rest and a 4-hour redistribution Tl-201 gated SPECT viability protocol, immediately followed by a technetium-99m planar equilibrium radionuclide angiography (ERNA). On gated SPECT images, various count statistics were calculated, and perfusion was automatically quantified by means of CardioMatch, which provided both the size and severity of MI defects. Rest and redistribution LVEFs were determined from gated SPECT with Germano's algorithm, whereas LVEFs were calculated from ERNA using the manufacturer's software. Mean LVEF values calculated with rest gated SPECT, redistribution gated SPECT, and planar ERNA were 30% +/- 13%, 30% +/- 13% and 33% +/- 13%, respectively. Significant differences between repeated gated SPECT LVEFs were not shown by means of the paired t test. Correlation coefficients were high between 20-minute and 4-hour scans (r = 0.89) and between gated SPECT and ERNA (r = 0.88 and r = 0.92 at 20 minutes and 4 hours, respectively). Additionally, close agreement between gated SPECT and ERNA was shown by means of the Bland-Altman plot, despite an underestimation of 3 units. Finally, neither the technical conditions (count density, heart rate, lung uptake, etc) nor the perfusion alteration (size, severity, redistribution) appeared to interfere with the precision and accuracy of gated SPECT LVEF measurement.

CONCLUSION

Tl-201 gated SPECT is a precise method for assessing LVEF within the same patient at 4-hour intervals, even with a substantial count decay, and it gives accurate results compared with planar ERNA, even in the case of large perfusion defects.

摘要

背景

心肌梗死(MI)评估中,心肌存活和左心室射血分数(LVEF)是重要指标。这两个变量可通过铊 - 201门控单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)同时评估;然而,用这种同位素测量LVEF的精度和准确性仍存在争议,尤其是在出现广泛灌注缺损和计数密度低的情况下。

方法与结果

50例有MI病史的患者接受了20分钟静息和4小时再分布的铊 - 201门控SPECT心肌存活检查方案,随后立即进行锝 - 99m平面平衡放射性核素血管造影(ERNA)。在门控SPECT图像上,计算各种计数统计量,并通过CardioMatch自动定量灌注,该软件可提供MI缺损的大小和严重程度。静息和再分布LVEF通过门控SPECT用Germano算法测定,而LVEF通过ERNA用制造商软件计算。静息门控SPECT、再分布门控SPECT和平面前位ERNA计算的平均LVEF值分别为30%±13%、30%±13%和33%±13%。配对t检验未显示重复门控SPECT LVEF之间存在显著差异。20分钟和4小时扫描之间(r = 0.89)以及门控SPECT和ERNA之间(20分钟和4小时时r分别为0.88和0.92)的相关系数较高。此外,尽管低估了3个单位,但Bland - Altman图显示门控SPECT和ERNA之间有良好的一致性。最后,无论是技术条件(计数密度、心率、肺摄取等)还是灌注改变(大小、严重程度、再分布)似乎都未干扰门控SPECT LVEF测量的精度和准确性。

结论

铊 - 201门控SPECT是一种精确的方法,即使在计数大幅衰减的情况下,也能在4小时间隔内对同一患者评估LVEF,并且与平面前位ERNA相比,即使在存在大面积灌注缺损的情况下也能给出准确结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验