• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

规范人体器官和产品。

Regulating human body parts and products.

作者信息

Fox M, McHale J

机构信息

Department of Law, University of Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Health Care Anal. 2000;8(2):83-6. doi: 10.1023/A:1009498810174.

DOI:10.1023/A:1009498810174
PMID:11183447
Abstract

This special volume of Health Care Analysis is dedicated to a consideration of the status of body parts and products and the role of law in regulating them. We argue that such a discussion is timely given the conflation of technological and academic concerns posed by the complex legal framework within which these issues are currently addressed and in the light of debates such as those regarding the storage of children's organs addressed by inquiries at Alder Hay and Bristol, United Kingdom. The contributors address specific legal problems which have been brought before the courts in the UK and other jurisdictions, something which we suggest is likely to occur with increasing regularity once the Human Rights Act 1998 comes into force in October 2000. The issues are also considered on a more theoretical level with papers exploring the role of concepts such as property, donation, commodification and kinship in these debates. While the volume focuses principally upon the manner in which these issues have arisen in a UK context, though with reference to certain comparative examples, the concepts discussed here are of more general application across other jurisdictions.

摘要

《医疗保健分析》这一特刊致力于探讨人体器官和产品的现状以及法律在监管它们方面所起的作用。我们认为,鉴于当前处理这些问题的复杂法律框架所引发的技术和学术问题的交织,以及诸如英国奥尔德海伊和布里斯托尔的调查所涉及的儿童器官储存等相关辩论,这样的讨论恰逢其时。撰稿人探讨了英国和其他司法管辖区法院所面临的具体法律问题,我们认为,一旦1998年《人权法案》于2000年10月生效,这种情况可能会越来越频繁地出现。这些问题也在更理论的层面上进行了探讨,相关论文探究了财产、捐赠、商品化和亲属关系等概念在这些辩论中的作用。虽然该特刊主要关注这些问题在英国背景下的出现方式,并参考了某些比较实例,但这里讨论的概念在其他司法管辖区有更广泛的适用性。

相似文献

1
Regulating human body parts and products.规范人体器官和产品。
Health Care Anal. 2000;8(2):83-6. doi: 10.1023/A:1009498810174.
2
Waste, ownership and bodily products.废物、所有权与身体产物
Health Care Anal. 2000;8(2):123-35. doi: 10.1023/A:1009494327013.
3
Commodification arguments for the legal prohibition of organ sale.关于法律禁止器官买卖的商品化观点。
Health Care Anal. 2000;8(2):189-201. doi: 10.1023/A:1009454612900.
4
An overview of legal aspects in organ transplantation--what are the family rights?器官移植法律问题概述——家属有哪些权利?
Ann Transplant. 2004;9(1):11-4.
5
The trespasses of property law.
J Med Ethics. 2014 Jan;40(1):19-22. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101439. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
6
France regulates organ imports.法国对器官进口进行监管。
BMJ. 1996 Mar 23;312(7033):730. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7033.730a.
7
Why does it matter how we regulate the use of human body parts?我们如何规范人体器官的使用为何重要?
J Med Ethics. 2014 Jan;40(1):3-9. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100941.
8
Legal requirements for donating and retaining organs: the Human Tissue Act.
Br J Community Nurs. 2006 Oct;11(10):446-9. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2006.11.10.21967.
9
Regulating the sale of human organs.规范人体器官买卖。
Va Law Rev. 1985 Sep;71(6):1015-38.
10
The rage of consent.同意的狂热
Curr Biol. 2004 Apr 6;14(7):R254-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.03.011.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical issues in molecular medicine of relevance to surgeons.与外科医生相关的分子医学中的伦理问题。
Can J Surg. 2004 Dec;47(6):414-21.

本文引用的文献

1
'I, me, mine': bodies, parts, and property.“我,自我,我的”:身体、部位与财产。
Med Law Int. 1998;3(4):299-317. doi: 10.1177/096853329800300404.
2
The man of property.有产者。
Med Law Rev. 1995 Autumn;3(3):251-74. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/3.3.251.