Tufano J T, Conrad D A, Liang S Y
Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
J Ambul Care Manage. 1999 Jul;22(3):47-57. doi: 10.1097/00004479-199907000-00009.
Medical groups are challenged to adopt a systematic, evidence-based approach to selecting a physician compensation method that supports the group's overall financial and organizational strategies, including managed care contracting strategies; is consistent with the philosophies, beliefs, and attitudes of the group's membership as they pertain to individual productivity; and can be supported by the organization's information technology, decision support, and management infrastructures. This article explains how research in physician profiling, benchmarking, general compensation theory, and physician productivity provides evidence that can serve as the foundation for a pragmatic approach to evaluating physician compensation method alternatives. It also presents a unique production-based compensation model for illustrative purposes.
医疗团体面临着采用一种系统的、基于证据的方法来选择医生薪酬方案的挑战,该方案要支持团体的整体财务和组织战略,包括管理式医疗合同战略;要与团体成员在个人生产力方面的理念、信念和态度相一致;并且能够得到组织的信息技术、决策支持和管理基础设施的支持。本文解释了医生绩效评估、标杆管理、一般薪酬理论和医生生产力方面的研究如何提供证据,作为评估医生薪酬方案替代方案的务实方法的基础。为了说明目的,本文还提出了一种独特的基于产出的薪酬模型。