Wright K W
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2000;98:41-8; discussion 48-50.
To evaluate the outcomes of the silicone tendon expander for the treatment of Brown's syndrome.
This paper consists of 2 parts: a chart review of patients who have under gone the silicone tendon elongation procedure for Brown's syndrome and a survey of the surgical experience of the members of the American Association of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. Charts of 15 consecutive Brown's syndrome patients who underwent the superior oblique tendon expander were reviewed by the author from 1987 to 1997. An additional patient referred to the author for management of complications of the silicone tendon expander procedure after surgery elsewhere for Brown's syndrome is reported. The second aspect of the study is a fax survey sent to all 450 members of the American Association of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus listed in the 1997-1998 directory. Pediatric ophthalmologists were asked to answer questions regarding their experience using the silicone tendon expander for Brown's syndrome.
Of 15 patients operated on by the author, preoperative limitation of elevation in adduction measured -4 in 14 patients and -3 in 1 patient preoperatively. Postoperatively, 14 of the 15 patients showed improved motility, with essentially normal versions in 10 patients (no more than +/- 1 oblique dysfunction); 3 patients were undercorrected (2 mild and 1 severely); and 2 had a consecutive superior oblique paresis (1 mild and 1 requiring an inferior oblique weakening procedure). The 1 patient with a severe undercorrection that did not improve after the silicone tendon elongation procedure showed continued restriction by intraoperative forced ductions after superior oblique tenotomy. Superior oblique tendon was not the cause of Brown's syndrome in this patient. The average final result graded on a scale of 1 to 10 (10 being best) was 8.3. Thirteen of 15 patients (87%) achieved a final result score of 7 or better with a single surgery, and an additional patient was corrected with a second surgery providing an overall success rate of 93%. Ten of the 15 patients had at least 11 months' follow-up, and 6 of the 10 patients showed a delayed improvement over a 4- to 6-month period. Five patients had more than 5 years of follow-up, and 4 (80%) had an excellent long-term outcome (final result, 9 to 10) with a single operations; all 5 had a good final outcome (final result, 7 to 10, mean 9.2) with 1 patient requiring a second surgery. There were no long-term complications, including no extrusions, no restriction of ocular rotations, and no infections. The patient who underwent the procedure elsewhere demonstrated limited movement of the eye to adduction elevation, and there was underaction of the ipsilateral superior oblique muscle. A reoperation performed by the author revealed positive forced ductions up and nasal ward. There were scars and adhesions in the area of the silicone implant, including scar to superior nasal sclera and superior rectus muscle. The silicone implant was removed and scar excised until forced ductions improved. This resulted in improved motility. Thirty-nine AAPOS members reported on 140 patients who had undergone the silicone tendon elongation procedure for Brown's syndrome. Judged by the surgeon on a scale of 1 to 10 (10 being best), 26 surgeons rated 91 patients (65%) as good with a score of 8 to 10, and 14 surgeons rated 18 patients (13%) poor with scores of 1 to 3. Complications were recorded for 9 patients and included scarring and restriction with removal of silicone implant in 4 and spontaneous extrusion in 5. Three of the 5 spontaneous extrusions came from the same surgeon, and in another case a surgeon used a 10 mm length of silicone.
A novel procedure, the silicone tendon expander, is an effective option for correcting Brown's syndrome caused by a stiff or inelastic superior oblique tendon; long-term outcomes are excellent. Proper technique with maintenance of the tendon capsule is critical to the successful outcome of the procedure.
评估硅胶肌腱扩张器治疗布朗综合征的效果。
本文包含两部分:对接受硅胶肌腱延长术治疗布朗综合征患者的病历回顾,以及对美国小儿眼科与斜视学会成员手术经验的调查。作者回顾了1987年至1997年连续15例接受上斜肌腱扩张器手术的布朗综合征患者的病历。此外,还报告了1例在其他地方接受布朗综合征硅胶肌腱扩张器手术后因并发症转诊至作者处的患者。研究的第二个方面是向1997 - 1998年名录中列出的美国小儿眼科与斜视学会的所有450名成员发送传真调查问卷。小儿眼科医生被要求回答有关他们使用硅胶肌腱扩张器治疗布朗综合征经验的问题。
在作者手术的15例患者中,术前内收时上抬受限在14例患者中为 - 4,1例患者为 - 3。术后,15例患者中有14例运动功能改善,10例患者基本正常(斜肌功能障碍不超过±1);3例矫正不足(2例轻度,1例重度);2例出现连续性上斜肌麻痹(1例轻度,1例需要行下斜肌减弱术)。1例在硅胶肌腱延长术后严重矫正不足且无改善的患者,在上斜肌腱切断术后术中强制牵拉显示仍有受限。该患者的上斜肌腱不是布朗综合征的病因。最终结果按1至10分(10分为最佳)评分,平均为8.3分。15例患者中有13例(87%)单次手术最终结果评分为7分或更高,另有1例患者经二次手术矫正,总体成功率为93%。15例患者中有10例至少随访了11个月,10例患者中有6例在4至6个月期间出现延迟改善。5例患者随访超过5年,4例(80%)单次手术获得了优异的长期结果(最终结果为9至10分);所有5例最终结果均良好(最终结果为7至10分,平均9.2分),1例患者需要二次手术。没有长期并发症,包括没有植入物脱出、眼球转动不受限以及没有感染。在其他地方接受该手术的患者内收上抬时眼球运动受限,同侧上斜肌功能不足。作者进行的再次手术显示向上和鼻侧的强制牵拉为阳性。硅胶植入区域有瘢痕和粘连,包括与鼻上巩膜和上直肌的瘢痕。取出硅胶植入物并切除瘢痕,直至强制牵拉改善。这使得运动功能得到改善。39名美国小儿眼科与斜视学会成员报告了140例接受硅胶肌腱延长术治疗布朗综合征的患者。根据外科医生按1至10分(10分为最佳)评分,26名外科医生将91例患者(65%)评为良好,评分在8至10分,14名外科医生将18例患者(13%)评为差,评分在1至3分。记录了9例患者的并发症,包括4例因瘢痕形成和受限而取出硅胶植入物,5例自发脱出。5例自发脱出中有3例来自同一位外科医生,在另一个病例中,一位外科医生使用了10毫米长的硅胶。
一种新的手术方法,即硅胶肌腱扩张器,是矫正由僵硬或无弹性的上斜肌腱引起的布朗综合征的有效选择;长期效果良好。正确的技术以及保持肌腱囊对于手术的成功结果至关重要。