Suppr超能文献

[参考电极位置对脑干听觉诱发电位的影响]

[The influence of reference electrode position on auditory evoked potentials in the brainstem].

作者信息

de Montes C, Manjón M, Viñuales M, Villanueva J, Menéndez C

机构信息

Departamento de Ciencias Morfológicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Sevilla, Avda. Sánchez-Pizjuán, 4. E-41009 Sevilla.

出版信息

Rev Neurol. 2000;31(11):1023-7.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In view of the discrepancy in the placement of electrodes and their effects on the auditory evoked potentials of the brainstem (PEAT), we made a statistical study of these potentials using four different sites for the reference electrode to determine the best position for it.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The study was done in 30 healthy volunteers aged between 17 and 22 years, 15 men and 15 women. In each person successive measurements were made of the PEAT, with the reference electrode on the vertex (Cz), high frontal (Fz), ear lobe of the opposite side to that of the ear being stimulated and the spinal apophysis of the 7th cervical vertebra (CV). In all cases the active electrode was placed on the ipsilateral ear lobe of the ear being stimulated. After obtaining tables of the normal values for the latency and wave amplitude of waves I to VII in each electrode montage used, we made a study of sex differences and results from the other ear using Student's t test for paired data.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were found between the latencies and amplitudes of the waves I to VII for the PEAT obtained with the montage used.

CONCLUSIONS

From our results, we may conclude that the position of the reference electrode does not seem to be a major factor when obtaining PEAT. However, in view of the recordings made, we prefer the reference electrode to be at Cz or Fz when obtaining PEAT, since a clearer recording is obtained when these positions are used. Influence of the reference electrode on PEAT.

摘要

引言

鉴于电极放置位置及其对脑干听觉诱发电位(PEAT)的影响存在差异,我们使用四个不同的参考电极位置对这些电位进行了统计学研究,以确定其最佳位置。

受试者与方法

该研究在30名年龄在17至22岁之间的健康志愿者中进行,其中男性15名,女性15名。对每个人连续测量PEAT,参考电极分别置于头顶(Cz)、额高部(Fz)、受刺激耳对侧的耳垂以及第七颈椎(CV)的棘突。在所有情况下,活性电极均置于受刺激耳的同侧耳垂。在获得每个电极组合中I至VII波潜伏期和波幅的正常值表后,我们使用配对数据的Student t检验对性别差异和另一耳的结果进行了研究。

结果

在所使用的电极组合获得的PEAT的I至VII波潜伏期和波幅之间未发现统计学上的显著差异。

结论

从我们的结果可以得出结论,在获得PEAT时,参考电极的位置似乎不是一个主要因素。然而,鉴于所做的记录,我们在获得PEAT时更倾向于将参考电极置于Cz或Fz,因为使用这些位置时可获得更清晰的记录。参考电极对PEAT的影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验