Pickersgill C H, Marr C M, Reid S W
Department of Veterinary Clinical Studies, University of Glasgow Veterinary School, UK.
Equine Vet J. 2001 Jan;33(1):33-7. doi: 10.2746/042516401776767494.
A quantitative investigation of the variation that can occur during the course of ultrasonography of the equine superficial digital flexor tendons (SDFT) was undertaken. The aim of this investigation was to use an objective measure, namely the measurement of CSA, to quantify the variability occurring during the course of the ultrasonographic assessment of the equine SDFT. The effects of 3 variables on the CSA measurements were determined. 1) Image acquisition operator (IAc): two different operators undertaking the ultrasonographic examination; 2) image analysis operator (IAn): two different operators undertaking the calculation of CSA values from previously stored images; and 3) analytical equipment (used during CSA measurement) (IEq): the use of 2 different sets of equipment during calculation of CSA values. Tendon cross-sectional area (CSA) measurements were used as the comparative variable of 3 potential sources: interoperator, during image acquisition; interoperator, during CSA measurement; and intraoperator, when using different analytical equipment. Two operators obtained transverse ultrasonographic images from the forelimb SDFTs of 16 National Hunt (NH) Thoroughbred (TB) racehorses, each undertaking analysis of their own and the other operator's images. One operator undertook analysis of their images using 2 sets of equipment. There was no statistically significant difference in the results obtained when different operators undertook image acquisition (P>0.05). At all but the most distal level, there was no significant difference when different equipment was used during analysis (P>0.05). A significant difference (P<0.01) was reported when different operators undertook image analysis, one operator consistently returning larger measurements. Different operators undertaking different stages of an examination can result in significant variability. To reduce confounding during ultrasonographic investigations involving multiple persons, one operator should undertake image analysis, although different operators may undertake image acquisition.
对马浅屈肌腱(SDFT)超声检查过程中可能出现的变异进行了定量研究。本研究的目的是使用一种客观测量方法,即横截面积(CSA)测量,来量化马SDFT超声评估过程中出现的变异性。确定了3个变量对CSA测量的影响。1)图像采集操作员(IAc):两名不同的操作员进行超声检查;2)图像分析操作员(IAn):两名不同的操作员根据先前存储的图像计算CSA值;3)分析设备(CSA测量期间使用)(IEq):在计算CSA值期间使用2套不同的设备。肌腱横截面积(CSA)测量用作3个潜在来源的比较变量:图像采集期间的操作员间差异、CSA测量期间的操作员间差异以及使用不同分析设备时的操作员内差异。两名操作员从16匹国家狩猎(NH)纯种马(TB)赛马的前肢SDFT获取横向超声图像,每人对自己和另一名操作员的图像进行分析。一名操作员使用2套设备对自己的图像进行分析。不同操作员进行图像采集时获得的结果无统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。除最远端水平外,分析期间使用不同设备时无显著差异(P>0.05)。不同操作员进行图像分析时报告有显著差异(P<0.01),一名操作员的测量结果始终较大。不同操作员进行检查的不同阶段可能导致显著的变异性。为了减少涉及多人的超声检查中的混杂因素,尽管不同操作员可以进行图像采集,但应由一名操作员进行图像分析。