Sahota O, Worley A, Hosking D J
Ageing and Disability Research Unit, Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, University Hospital, Nottingham.
J Public Health Med. 2000 Dec;22(4):466-72. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/22.4.466.
Osteoporosis is now recognized by the World Health Organization and the Department of Health as a major public health problem. In 1994, the Advisory Group on Osteoporosis (AGO), set up by the Department of Health, recommended that Health Authorities and general practitioner fundholders should purchase bone densitometry services for the management of osteoporosis. The aims of this study were to assess the criteria for requests for bone densitometry from primary care in comparison with the AGO recommendations and to compare the numbers of patients referred with a low-trauma osteoporotic fracture with the expected number of fractures in the Nottingham area.
Patient referral data and requests for bone densitometry were collected by case note review of all new patients referred to the Nottingham Osteoporosis Clinic over a 12 month period and then compared with the AGO recommendations. The patients referred with a history of a low-trauma fracture were then compared with the expected incidence of fractures, calculated using age-sex-specific fracture incidence data applied to the Nottingham population Census statistics.
A total of 413 patients were referred to the Osteoporosis Clinic for bone densitometry. Almost two-thirds of the patients had no clinical indicators for requests for scanning, in comparison with the AGO recommendations. Seventy-seven patients were referred with vertebral fracture, 12 hip, 20 colles and 26 other fractures. Using age-sex-specific fracture incidence data applied to the Nottingham population Census statistics, it was estimated that the expected incidence of hip fractures would be 812, distal forearm fractures 514 and vertebral fractures presenting to clinical attention 625. This represents 1.5 per cent of the total hip fractures, 3.9 per cent distal forearm and 12.3 per cent vertebral actually presenting to the Osteoporosis Clinic.
Bone densitometry was requested in up to 60 per cent of the patients with no clinical risk factors to warrant bone densitometry. Osteoporosis-related fractures remain unrecognized in clinical practice. The majority of patients do not receive specialist assessment despite being at high risk of future fracture. Further steps are necessary to educate health care professionals in primary and secondary care, but more importantly, to direct services more proactively in those at high risk of future fracture.
骨质疏松症如今已被世界卫生组织和卫生部认定为一个主要的公共卫生问题。1994年,卫生部设立的骨质疏松症咨询小组(AGO)建议,卫生当局和全科医生基金持有者应为骨质疏松症的管理购买骨密度检测服务。本研究的目的是评估初级保健机构提出的骨密度检测申请标准,并与AGO的建议进行比较,同时将低创伤性骨质疏松性骨折患者的转诊数量与诺丁汉地区预期的骨折数量进行比较。
通过对转诊至诺丁汉骨质疏松症诊所的所有新患者进行为期12个月的病例记录审查,收集患者转诊数据和骨密度检测申请,然后与AGO的建议进行比较。接着,将有低创伤骨折病史的患者与预期骨折发生率进行比较,预期骨折发生率使用应用于诺丁汉人口普查统计数据的年龄和性别特异性骨折发生率数据进行计算。
共有413名患者被转诊至骨质疏松症诊所进行骨密度检测。与AGO的建议相比,近三分之二的患者没有进行扫描申请的临床指标。77名患者因椎体骨折被转诊,12名因髋部骨折,20名因科雷氏骨折,26名因其他骨折。使用应用于诺丁汉人口普查统计数据的年龄和性别特异性骨折发生率数据,估计髋部骨折的预期发生率为812例,前臂远端骨折为514例,引起临床关注的椎体骨折为625例。这分别占实际转诊至骨质疏松症诊所的髋部骨折总数的1.5%、前臂远端骨折的3.9%和椎体骨折的12.3%。
在高达60%没有临床风险因素的患者中也申请了骨密度检测,而这些因素本应成为进行骨密度检测的依据。骨质疏松症相关骨折在临床实践中仍未得到识别。尽管大多数患者未来发生骨折的风险很高,但他们并未得到专科评估。有必要采取进一步措施对初级和二级医疗保健专业人员进行教育,但更重要的是,要更积极地为未来骨折风险高的人群提供服务。