Dollberg S, Kuint J, Mazkereth R, Mimouni F B
Department of Neonatology, Lis Maternity Hospital, Tel Aviv, Israel.
J Am Coll Nutr. 2000 Nov-Dec;19(6):797-800. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2000.10718080.
To test the hypothesis that continuous gastric infusion (CGI) is better tolerated than intermittent gastric bolus (IGB) in small very low birth weight (VLBW) infants.
Two-center, prospective, randomized, unmasked clinical trial.
28 VLBW infants (birth weight <1250 g). A strict feeding protocol was followed.
Patients were randomized to IGB or CGI.
Time to reach full feeds (160 cc/kg/d)(by design and real), daily weight, caloric intake, residual gastric volume and type of feeding (formula vs. human milk vs. both).
Five infants failed to complete the study because of death (n = 4) or protocol violation (n = 1). The two groups did not differ by birth weight or gestational age; infants fed via IGB reached full feeds earlier (p = 0.03) and had less delay in reaching full feeds than infants fed via CGI.
Contrary to our hypothesis, gravity IGB is more effective than CGI in improving feeding tolerance in small VLBW infants.