Suppr超能文献

[心身疾病患者两个诊断组在症状自评量表90修订版(SCL-90-R)上的差异。在随访研究中使用SCL-90-R的后果]

[Differences in 2 diagnostic groups of psychosomatic patients on the Symptom Checklist 90-R (SCL-90-R). Consequences for using SCL-90-R in follow-up research].

作者信息

Geiser F, Imbierowicz K, Schilling G, Conrad R, Liedtke R

机构信息

Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie der Universität Bonn.

出版信息

Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2000 Dec;50(12):447-53. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-9231.

Abstract

680 unselected outpatients of our Psychosomatic Clinic were divided into six diagnostic groups and examined by the SCL-90-R. By ANOVA we found differences of means between the diagnostic groups for the global severity score (GSI) and for the subscale scores. We describe the model of Jacobson et al. [1,2] for the determination of cut-off-points and reliable change indices for the assessment of changes over time, e.g. after psychotherapy. Our results lead to the conclusion that, although an overall reliable change index for the GSI can be applied to all psychosomatic patients, cut-off-points should be different following the diagnostic groups. Furthermore, information from the SCL-90-R-subscales as well as other specific symptom scales should be used for the interpretation of significant changes of the GSI.

摘要

我们身心诊所的680名未经挑选的门诊患者被分为六个诊断组,并接受了症状自评量表-90修订版(SCL-90-R)的检查。通过方差分析,我们发现诊断组之间在总体严重程度得分(GSI)和分量表得分方面存在均值差异。我们描述了雅各布森等人[1,2]用于确定分界点和可靠变化指数的模型,这些指数用于评估随时间的变化,例如心理治疗后的变化。我们的结果得出结论,尽管GSI的总体可靠变化指数可应用于所有身心疾病患者,但分界点应因诊断组而异。此外,SCL-90-R分量表以及其他特定症状量表的信息应被用于解释GSI的显著变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验