• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用简明症状量表-18对儿童癌症幸存者进行筛查:与症状自评量表-90修订版的分类一致性

Screening childhood cancer survivors with the brief symptom inventory-18: classification agreement with the symptom checklist-90-revised.

作者信息

Recklitis Christopher J, Rodriguez Paola

机构信息

The Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Harvard Medical School, Suffolk University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

Psychooncology. 2007 May;16(5):429-36. doi: 10.1002/pon.1069.

DOI:10.1002/pon.1069
PMID:16929465
Abstract

The Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18) is an 18-item symptom checklist used as a brief distress screening in cancer and other medical patients. This study evaluated the validity of the BSI-18 in a sample of 221 adult survivors of childhood cancers ages 18-55 (median = 26). Validity of the BSI-18 was compared to the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R). Results indicated the BSI-18 scales had acceptable internal consistency (alpha >0.80) and were highly correlated with the corresponding SCL-90-R subscales (correlations from 0.88 to 0.94). When subjects were classified as case positive (significantly distressed) using the BSI-18 manual case-rule, classification agreement with the SCL-90-R was poor as evidenced by low sensitivity (41.78%). An alternative BSI-18 case-rule previously developed for cancer patients using the General Severity Index (GSI; GSI t-score >or=57) demonstrated better sensitivity (83.54%). ROC analysis indicated the BSI-18 had strong diagnostic utility relative to the SCL-90-R (AUC = 0.98) and several possible GSI cut-off scores were evaluated. The optimal cut-of score was a t-score >or=50 which had a sensitivity of 97.47% and a specificity of 85.21%. Results support use of the BSI-18 with adult survivors of childhood cancer but indicate an alternative case-rule must be used.

摘要

简明症状量表-18(BSI-18)是一个包含18个条目的症状清单,用于对癌症患者和其他内科患者进行简短的痛苦筛查。本研究在221名年龄在18至55岁(中位数=26岁)的儿童癌症成年幸存者样本中评估了BSI-18的有效性。将BSI-18的有效性与症状自评量表-90修订版(SCL-90-R)进行了比较。结果表明,BSI-18各分量表具有可接受的内部一致性(α>0.80),并且与相应的SCL-90-R分量表高度相关(相关性从0.88至0.94)。当使用BSI-18手册病例规则将受试者分类为病例阳性(明显痛苦)时,与SCL-90-R的分类一致性较差,低敏感性(41.78%)证明了这一点。先前为癌症患者开发的一种替代BSI-18病例规则,使用总体严重程度指数(GSI;GSI t分数≥57)显示出更好的敏感性(83.54%)。ROC分析表明,相对于SCL-90-R,BSI-18具有很强的诊断效用(AUC = 0.98),并评估了几个可能的GSI临界值分数。最佳临界值分数是t分数≥50,其敏感性为97.47%,特异性为85.21%。结果支持在儿童癌症成年幸存者中使用BSI-18,但表明必须使用替代病例规则。

相似文献

1
Screening childhood cancer survivors with the brief symptom inventory-18: classification agreement with the symptom checklist-90-revised.使用简明症状量表-18对儿童癌症幸存者进行筛查:与症状自评量表-90修订版的分类一致性
Psychooncology. 2007 May;16(5):429-36. doi: 10.1002/pon.1069.
2
Screening adult survivors of childhood cancer with the distress thermometer: a comparison with the SCL-90-R.使用苦恼温度计对成年期儿童癌症幸存者进行筛查:与症状自评量表-90修订版的比较。
Psychooncology. 2007 Nov;16(11):1046-9. doi: 10.1002/pon.1212.
3
Does the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 case rule apply in adult survivors of childhood cancer? Comparison with the Symptom Checklist-90.Brief Symptom Inventory-18 病例规则是否适用于儿童癌症幸存者?与症状清单-90 的比较。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2012 Jul;37(6):650-9. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jss050. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
4
Distress and its correlates in Korean cancer patients: pilot use of the distress thermometer and the problem list.韩国癌症患者的痛苦及其相关因素:痛苦温度计和问题清单的初步应用
Psychooncology. 2008 Jun;17(6):548-55. doi: 10.1002/pon.1275.
5
Psychological distress in adult survivors of childhood cancer: the Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor study.成年癌症患儿幸存者的心理困扰:瑞士儿童癌症幸存者研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 1;28(10):1740-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.4534. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
6
[Differences in 2 diagnostic groups of psychosomatic patients on the Symptom Checklist 90-R (SCL-90-R). Consequences for using SCL-90-R in follow-up research].[心身疾病患者两个诊断组在症状自评量表90修订版(SCL-90-R)上的差异。在随访研究中使用SCL-90-R的后果]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2000 Dec;50(12):447-53. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-9231.
7
Screening for distress in cancer patients: the NCCN rapid-screening measure.癌症患者痛苦筛查:NCCN快速筛查措施
Psychooncology. 2004 Nov;13(11):792-9. doi: 10.1002/pon.796.
8
Screening for social phobia in medical in- and outpatients with the German version of the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN).使用德语版社交恐惧症量表(SPIN)对内科和外科门诊患者进行社交恐惧症筛查。
J Anxiety Disord. 2008 Jun;22(5):849-59. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.08.011. Epub 2007 Sep 4.
9
The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) as a screening tool for psychological disorders in patients with epilepsy and mild intellectual disabilities in residential care.简明症状量表(BSI)作为一种用于寄宿照料机构中癫痫和轻度智力障碍患者心理障碍筛查工具。
Epilepsy Behav. 2005 Aug;7(1):85-94. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2005.03.018.
10
Screening for psychologic distress in ambulatory cancer patients.门诊癌症患者心理困扰的筛查
Cancer. 2005 Apr 1;103(7):1494-502. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20940.

引用本文的文献

1
The Brief Symptom Inventory in the Swiss general population: Presentation of norm scores and predictors of psychological distress.《瑞士一般人群中的简明症状量表:常模得分的呈现及心理困扰的预测因素》。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 3;19(7):e0305192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305192. eCollection 2024.
2
A comprehensive examination of mental health in patients with head and neck cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.对头颈部癌症患者的心理健康进行全面检查:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2024 Apr 30;8(3). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkae031.
3
Antisocial Personality Traits, Substance Use, and Somatization: A Brief Consideration of Their Interrelation.
反社会人格特质、物质使用与躯体化:对它们相互关系的简要考虑。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jan 3;21(1):61. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21010061.
4
Development of the Breast Cancer Survivors Symptom Checklist for Use in Follow-Up Multidisciplinary Appointments.用于后续多学科会诊的乳腺癌幸存者症状清单的开发。
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2022 Oct 7;13:199-208. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S364625. eCollection 2022.
5
Development and validation of 21-item outcome inventory (OI-21).21项结果量表(OI-21)的开发与验证
Heliyon. 2022 Jun 7;8(6):e09682. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09682. eCollection 2022 Jun.
6
Common measures or common metrics? A plea to harmonize measurement results.常用指标还是通用指标?呼吁协调测量结果
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2022 Sep;29(5):1755-1767. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2742. Epub 2022 Jun 19.
7
Recommendations for the surveillance of mental health problems in childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors: a report from the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group.儿童、青少年和青年癌症幸存者心理健康问题监测建议:来自国际儿童癌症晚期效应指南协调组的报告。
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Apr;23(4):e184-e196. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00750-6.
8
Minority Stress and Sexual Functioning Among African American Women With At-Risk Partners in South Los Angeles.南洛杉矶高危伴侣非裔美国女性的少数族裔压力与性功能。
J Sex Med. 2022 Apr;19(4):603-612. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2022.02.005. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
9
Psychiatric Distress and Suicidal Tendencies in Adult Cancer Survivors: Verifying the Validity of the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 for Identifying Suicidal Ideation in the Hospitalized Population of Mainland China.成年癌症幸存者的精神困扰与自杀倾向:验证简明症状量表-18在中国内地住院人群中识别自杀意念的有效性
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2022 Jun;29(2):403-411. doi: 10.1007/s10880-021-09779-z. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
10
"I don't take for granted that I am doing well today": a mixed methods study on well-being, impact of cancer, and supportive needs in long-term childhood cancer survivors.“我不会想当然地认为我今天过得很好”:一项关于幸福感、癌症影响和长期儿童癌症幸存者支持需求的混合方法研究。
Qual Life Res. 2022 May;31(5):1483-1497. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-03042-6. Epub 2021 Nov 24.