Pecquet C, Autegarden J E, Kural-Menasche S, Perez G, Menasche P, Sanson-LePors M J, Abuaf N, Leynadier F
Centre d'allergologie, hôpital Tenon, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France.
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2000 Dec;19(10):755-7. doi: 10.1016/s0750-7658(00)00318-x.
A 66-year-old patient, undergoing heart surgery, developed an anaphylactic reaction following the first administration of a test-dose of aprotinin. Skin tests were performed six months later. Prick-tests with 10(-2) and 10(-1) aprotinin dilutions were negative but intradermal reaction with a 10(-3) dilution was clearly positive. The level of aprotinin specific IgE was high, both in the serum obtained before surgery and in the one sampled on the day of the testing. As no reaction was observed during the tests, skin-testing and specific IgE appear to be an interesting alternative to a potentially dangerous test-dose, but they both need further evaluation.
一名66岁接受心脏手术的患者在首次注射试验剂量的抑肽酶后发生过敏反应。六个月后进行了皮肤试验。用10(-2)和10(-1)抑肽酶稀释液进行的点刺试验为阴性,但用10(-3)稀释液进行的皮内反应明显为阳性。手术前采集的血清和检测当天采集的血清中,抑肽酶特异性IgE水平都很高。由于在检测过程中未观察到反应,皮肤试验和特异性IgE似乎是潜在危险的试验剂量的一个有趣替代方法,但它们都需要进一步评估。