Ghubash R, Daradkeh T K, Al Naseri K S, Al Bloushi N B, Al Daheri A M
Department of Psychiatry & Beh Sciences, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, UAE University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2000 Winter;46(4):241-9. doi: 10.1177/002076400004600402.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the CES-D.
Three samples of young Arab females were chosen from different young female populations (n =450). The translated version of the CES-D, sociodemographic and risk factors questionnaires were applied to the above three samples. A subsample was selected (n = 30) to re-rate the scale items and the same sample was interviewed by the SCID. The internal consistency and test-re-test reliability were estimated as well as the factor structure of the Arabic CES-D. The discriminative and criterion validity of the scale was also investigated using the ROC analysis.
Seventy five percent (n = 350) of the subjects completed the scale. Alpha coefficient was found to be 0.88 and the split-half reliability was 0.83. The average re-test reliability (ICC = 0.59). Factor analysis yielded three factors: interpersonal problems, mixed affective/somatic factor and the positive affect factor. There was significant differences in mean total score between depressed and non-depressed subjects as classified by SCID as well as by self-perception of depression and the need for treatment. ROC analysis revealed that a cut-off point of 21 discriminated best between depressed and non-depressed subjects (sensitivity= 82%, specificity = 83% with AUC of 84%).
The Arabic CES-D was found to possess reasonable reliability and reasonable discriminative and criterion validity.
本研究旨在调查阿拉伯语版流调中心抑郁量表(CES-D)的心理测量学特性。
从不同年轻女性群体中选取了三组年轻阿拉伯女性样本(n = 450)。将CES-D的翻译版本、社会人口学和风险因素问卷应用于上述三个样本。选取一个子样本(n = 30)对量表项目进行重新评分,并由SCID对同一样本进行访谈。评估了阿拉伯语CES-D的内部一致性和重测信度以及因子结构。还使用ROC分析研究了该量表的判别效度和效标效度。
75%(n = 350)的受试者完成了量表。发现α系数为0.88,分半信度为0.83。平均重测信度(ICC = 0.59)。因子分析产生了三个因子:人际问题、混合情感/躯体因子和积极情感因子。根据SCID分类以及抑郁的自我认知和治疗需求,抑郁组和非抑郁组的平均总分存在显著差异。ROC分析显示,截断点为21时,抑郁组和非抑郁组之间的区分最佳(敏感性 = 82%,特异性 = 83%,AUC为84%)。
发现阿拉伯语CES-D具有合理的信度以及合理的判别效度和效标效度。