Mertens H, Van Holsbeeck B, Gryspeerdt S, Gellens P, Baekelandt M, Lefere P
Dienst Medische Beeldvorming, Stedelijk Ziekenhuis, Roeselare.
JBR-BTR. 2000 Oct;83(5):238-42.
This study evaluates the use of pulse spray pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (PSPMT) in combination with a low dose urokinase infusion and a possible secondary percutaneous treatment in the management of acute multiple limb ischemia. A retrospective analysis of 185 patients treated with PSPMT revealed eight patients with acute simultaneous ischemia of more than 1 limb. Seven patients presented with acute ischemia of both lower limbs; one patient presented with acute ischemia of the left arm and both lower limbs. All patients were treated using a combination of PSPMT and low dose urokinase infusion. The combination of PSPMT and low dose urokinase infusion was completely successful in 6 cases. In 1 patient with bronchogenic carcinoma PSPMT failed and immediate surgical thrombectomy was performed. In the other patient we obtained clot dissolution with thrombolysis in one leg, residual clots at the popliteal level in the other leg however had to be removed by surgical embolectomy. Embolism was the cause of the occlusion in 6 patients. Atherosclerotic disease appeared to be the underlying cause in the other 2 patients. Atherosclerotic disease was treated with balloon angioplasty and stenting. In the 8 patients with multiple limb ischemia, combination of PSPMT, low dose urokinase infusion, and possibly secondary treatment was useful and constituted a valuable alternative to open surgery. Acute occlusion of the abdominal aorta and acute leg ischemia have a high mortality and amputation rate with variable results in treatment. The use of thrombolysis has reduced the necessity of surgery in arterial occlusive disease and simplifies the treatment of native artery occlusion. Especially in patients with long and multi-level occlusions with poor outflow, thrombolysis seems to be the treatment of choice. In our analysis of 8 cases with acute multiple limb ischemia we review our experience with the combination of pulse spray pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (PSPMT), low dose continuous urokinase infusion and a possible subsequent percutaneous treatment of the obstructing lesion. The final purpose was to investigate if this combination is a successful and safe method in the treatment of acute multiple limb ischemia.
本研究评估脉冲喷雾药物机械溶栓(PSPMT)联合低剂量尿激酶输注以及可能的二次经皮治疗在急性多肢缺血管理中的应用。对185例接受PSPMT治疗的患者进行回顾性分析,发现8例患者出现超过1条肢体的急性同时性缺血。7例患者表现为双下肢急性缺血;1例患者表现为左臂及双下肢急性缺血。所有患者均采用PSPMT联合低剂量尿激酶输注进行治疗。PSPMT联合低剂量尿激酶输注在6例患者中完全成功。1例支气管肺癌患者PSPMT失败,随即进行了手术取栓。另1例患者,一条腿通过溶栓实现了血栓溶解,但另一条腿腘动脉水平残留血栓,不得不通过手术取栓清除。6例患者的闭塞原因是栓塞。另外2例患者的潜在病因似乎是动脉粥样硬化疾病。动脉粥样硬化疾病采用球囊血管成形术和支架置入术治疗。在8例多肢缺血患者中,PSPMT、低剂量尿激酶输注以及可能的二次治疗联合应用是有效的,是开放手术的一种有价值的替代方法。腹主动脉急性闭塞和急性下肢缺血死亡率和截肢率高,治疗效果不一。溶栓的应用减少了动脉闭塞性疾病的手术必要性,并简化了天然动脉闭塞的治疗。特别是对于流出道不佳的长节段和多节段闭塞患者,溶栓似乎是首选治疗方法。在我们对8例急性多肢缺血病例的分析中,我们回顾了脉冲喷雾药物机械溶栓(PSPMT)、低剂量持续尿激酶输注以及可能随后对阻塞病变进行经皮治疗联合应用的经验。最终目的是研究这种联合应用在治疗急性多肢缺血中是否是一种成功且安全的方法。