Chen R S, Liu C C, Cheng M R, Lin C P
Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, National Taiwan University, No 1, Chang-Te Street, Taipei, Taiwan.
Oper Dent. 2000 Sep-Oct;25(5):411-7.
Due to the lack of adhesiveness of amalgam to tooth structure, several adhesive cements have been utilized in bonded amalgam restorations. This study evaluated whether Fuji-II glass-ionomer cement is an appropriate adhesive liner in bonded amalgam restorations. Two adhesive composite luting cements (Amalgambond Plus and Panavia-21) and Copalite cavity liner were compared. The study was conducted in two phases. In the first part, we quantitatively assessed the tensile bond strengths as well as the failure modes of amalgam bonded to human dentin, using different adhesive liners. In each group, the flat dentin surface was treated with the assigned adhesive cement with a Teflon mold, followed by condensation of amalgam (Valiant PhD) onto it. Each group's mean tensile bond strengths were recorded and the statistical analysis by one way ANOVA showed no significant differences among groups (p > 0.05). Similar to the fracture patterns of the Amalgambond Plus and Panavia-21 groups, the failure mode of Fuji-II group was predominantly adhesive fracture. In the second part, the fracture strengths of amalgam restored teeth were measured using different adhesive liners. Standard MOD cavities were prepared in each tooth except for the intact tooth group. After treatment with the assigned adhesives or varnish, the cavities were restored with amalgam. Fracture strengths were then measured and the fractured interfaces examined using a scanning electron microscope. The fracture strengths of the intact tooth, Amalgambond Plus, Panavia-21 and Fuji-II groups were significantly higher than those of the Copalite and prepared cavity without restoration groups (p < 0.01). Accordingly, Fuji-II glass-ionomer cement, when used as an adhesive liner of amalgam restoration, may effectively reinforce the remaining tooth structure and, therefore, enhance the fracture resistance of the amalgam-restored teeth.
由于汞合金与牙齿结构缺乏黏附性,几种黏结性水门汀已被用于黏结汞合金修复体。本研究评估了富士II型玻璃离子水门汀是否是黏结汞合金修复体中合适的黏结衬层。将两种黏结性复合黏固水门汀(Amalgambond Plus和Panavia-21)与Copalite窝洞衬层进行了比较。该研究分两个阶段进行。在第一部分中,我们使用不同的黏结衬层,定量评估了汞合金与人类牙本质黏结的拉伸黏结强度以及失效模式。在每组中,用特氟龙模具将指定的黏结性水门汀处理平坦的牙本质表面,然后在其上压实汞合金(Valiant PhD)。记录每组的平均拉伸黏结强度,单向方差分析的统计分析表明各组之间无显著差异(p>0.05)。与Amalgambond Plus组和Panavia-21组的断裂模式相似,富士II组的失效模式主要是黏附性断裂。在第二部分中,使用不同的黏结衬层测量了汞合金修复牙齿的断裂强度。除完整牙齿组外,在每颗牙齿上制备标准的MOD洞。用指定的黏结剂或清漆处理后,用汞合金修复窝洞。然后测量断裂强度,并使用扫描电子显微镜检查断裂界面。完整牙齿组、Amalgambond Plus组、Panavia-21组和富士II组的断裂强度显著高于Copalite组和未修复的制备洞组(p<0.01)。因此,富士II型玻璃离子水门汀用作汞合金修复体的黏结衬层时,可有效增强剩余牙齿结构,从而提高汞合金修复牙齿的抗折性。