Suppr超能文献

不同粘结系统对粘结银汞合金修复体固位强度的影响。

The effect of different adhesive systems on the retention strength of bonded amalgam restorations.

作者信息

Ghavamnasiri Marjaneh, Moosavi Horieh

机构信息

Department of Operative Dentistry of the School of Dentistry and Dental Research Center at Mashhad University of Medical Sciences in Mashhad, Iran.

出版信息

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008 Feb 1;9(2):97-104.

Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of bonded amalgam to dentin when unfilled and filled adhesive systems are employed using different application modes and to compare the adhesives with a cavity varnish and unlined restorations.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

One hundred and twenty sound third human molar teeth were used in the study. A cylindrical cavity 3.3 mm in diameter was prepared in a cross section of dentin approximately 3.0 mm in thickness. The specimens were divided into six experimental groups (n=20) according to the cavity liner used in the prepared cylindrical cavity: One Coat Bond (O), Scotchbond Multi-Purpose(S) , Panavia 21 (Pa), PQ1 (P), Copalite (C), and the unlined (U) group which served as the control group. Cavity surfaces were treated with the assigned adhesive/liner according to manufacturer's instructions then restored with amalgam. After storage in saline solution for seven days at 37 degrees C, the specimens were subjected to a push-out test at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The mode of failure was assessed by microscopic analysis of the fracture sites. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan Multiple range tests (a=0.05).

RESULTS

No significant difference in amalgam-dentin bond strength was found among O (23.47 MPa), S (21.02 MPa), and Pa (20.06 MPa) adhesive groups, but there was a significant difference between each of these groups and the P and C groups. The U group exhibited significantly lower retention than the other groups (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Different bond strengths were observed with the different types of dentin bonding agents and liners employed. The lowest bond strength was seen in the U group.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

A statistically significant difference in bond strength was observed with O, S, and Pa compared to P, but this finding is not sufficient to rely on the bonding of amalgam to dentin, particularly in complex amalgam restorations.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估使用不同应用方式的未填充和填充粘结系统时,粘结汞合金与牙本质的粘结强度,并将这些粘结剂与窝洞封闭剂和未衬里修复体进行比较。

方法和材料

本研究使用了120颗健康的人第三磨牙。在厚度约为3.0mm的牙本质横截面上制备一个直径3.3mm的圆柱形窝洞。根据制备的圆柱形窝洞中使用的窝洞衬里,将标本分为六个实验组(n = 20):单涂层粘结剂(O)、多功能Scotchbond粘结剂(S)、Panavia 21粘结剂(Pa)、PQ1粘结剂(P)、天然树脂(C),以及作为对照组的未衬里组(U)。根据制造商的说明,用指定的粘结剂/衬里处理窝洞表面,然后用汞合金修复。在37℃的盐溶液中储存7天后,以1mm/min的十字头速度对标本进行推出试验。通过对断裂部位的显微镜分析评估失效模式。数据采用方差分析(ANOVA)和邓肯多重范围检验进行分析(α = 0.05)。

结果

在O组(23.47MPa)、S组(21.02MPa)和Pa组(20.06MPa)粘结剂组之间,汞合金 - 牙本质粘结强度没有显著差异,但这些组中的每一组与P组和C组之间存在显著差异。U组的固位力明显低于其他组(P < 0.05)。

结论

使用不同类型的牙本质粘结剂和衬里观察到不同的粘结强度。U组的粘结强度最低。

临床意义

与P组相比,O组、S组和Pa组在粘结强度上观察到统计学上的显著差异,但这一发现不足以依赖汞合金与牙本质的粘结,特别是在复杂的汞合金修复中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验